In previous interglacial periods, namely about 125,000, 240,000 and 340,000 years ago, temperatures were about three degrees warmer than now.  Or so we had thought.If you found out that the temperatures in Antarctica were actually about six degrees warmer then, or three degrees warmer than you had thought before, what would you conclude?The obvious conclusion would be that current temperatures, and even those predicted by man-caused global warming models, are even less alarming than you thought before.  We are even further away from an all-time high than we had thought.But if you are a climate researcher, all evidence must conclude that global warming is man-made and bad, and any new evidence must show things are even worse than we had thought before.  If it doesn't, no more grants for you and you won't get published.So what would you, climate researcher whose livelihood and reputation depends on grants and getting published, then conclude?  As reported in Nature,...(Read Full Post)