|
| |||||||
|
« Now it's Senate Democrats who are threatening insurers |
Blog Home Page
| Steyn: 'Stimulus hits a pothole' »
August 23, 2009 What big government? Feds to regulate garage sales
This story is actually a couple of days old but I wanted to write about it because it portrays a bureaucratic mindset that we would have to deal with if health care reform passes.
The Bush era Congress passed the "Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act" in August of 2008. It was, as most legislation, an overreaction to the Chinese toy scare. It was designed to "require extensive testing of any toy, book, or item of clothing intended for kids under the age of 12." But ambitious bureaucrats have taken the bill and interpreted it to mean "used" toys as well. And now it appears that CPSC enforcers are going to be fanning out across the country in search of garage sales and church bazzars that are not in compliance. No - I'm not kidding. An agency of the federal government in Washington is actually going to reach all the way down to your neighborhood and make sure that you're following their interpretation of the law. This handy 28-pager from the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) reminds the American people that, thanks to the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (which I have blogged about here and here), the government is totally in charge of your yard sale...James Rosen of McClatchy has a report on the efforts of the CPSC: If you're planning a garage sale or organizing a church bazaar, you'd best beware: You could be breaking a new federal law. As part of a campaign called Resale Roundup, the federal government is cracking down on the secondhand sales of dangerous and defective products. The initiative, which targets toys and other products for children, enforces a new provision that makes it a crime to resell anything that's been recalled by its manufacturer. And how about this for bureaucratic double speak: "We're not looking to come across as being heavy-handed," he said. "We want to make sure that everybody knows what the rules of engagement are to help spur greater compliance, so that enforcement becomes less of an issue. But we're still going to enforce." Not "heavy handed" but "still going to enforce?" What the hell is that? "Spur[ing]" greater compliance and one begins to wonder what the "spur" is going to be. This is the danger of putting bureaucrats in charge of anything, much less health care. It is their interpretation of the law that will matter in the end. And given how broadly that law is being drawn, we might expect just about any nightmare to emerge after the bureaucrats get through with doing their job. |
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
|