|
| |||||||
|
« The Fatah convention: A litmus test for the sanity of the West |
Blog Home Page
| Chuck Hagel climbing the White House ladder »
August 14, 2009 Cap and trade dead in the Senate?
This seems pretty conclusive, although the writing has been on the wall almost since the House passed cap and trade. It was Obama's last great legislative triumph and Democratic House members went way out on a limb supporting their leader - even at the expense of jobs in their own states.
It looks like the Senate is going to yank the ground out from underneath them, according to this piece in Bloomberg by Daniel Whitten and Simon Lomax: The U.S. Senate should abandon efforts to pass legislation curbing greenhouse-gas emissions this year and concentrate on a narrower bill to require use of renewable energy, four Democratic lawmakers say. "The problem of doing both of them together is that it becomes too big of a lift," Senator Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas said in an interview last week. "I see the cap-and-trade being a real problem." Hard to see how the Democrats can get a veto-proof 60 votes on cap and trade now - unless, as Lincoln suggests, they narrow the scope of the bill and deep six the emissions provisions. There are just too many vulnerable Democrats who would have to explain to the home folks why they voted for a bill that is expected to cost 2 million jobs. This may actually help in the health reform debate as the House is much more likely to approve a public option than the senate. Will House Democrats once again put their hides on the line by voting for socialized medicine only to see the senate remove that provision in conference? It only puts more pressure on the House Blue Dogs to say no to Obamacare. |
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
|