|
| |||||||
|
« Specter: Republicans killed Kemp |
Blog Home Page
| Climate change bill in trouble »
May 4, 2009 Are Pakistani nukes safe?
They keep telling us that they are but it is hard to determine whether that is just bluster or whether they really have the situation well in hand. In fact, the more assurances they give us, it seems the less we believe them.
Bush authorized $100 million to "harden" the Pakistan nuclear sites but according to this troubling piece in the New York Times by David Sanger , no one knows where or how that money has been spent, or how much of it has been used. The facility to train Pakistani troops in nuclear security is apparently way behind schedule too: "I'm confident that we can make sure that Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is secure," Mr. Obama said Wednesday, "primarily, initially, because the Pakistani Army, I think, recognizes the hazards of those weapons falling into the wrong hands." He added: "We've got strong military-to-military consultation and cooperation." Coupled with the fact that we don't know where all the nuclear sites are located and what you have is the worst possible world when it comes to nuclear security; uncertainty. Pakistan is in deep, deep trouble. The civilian government may be just weeks away from collapse if you believe General David Petreaus who has warned our government that a clock is ticking in Pakistan and unless drastic changes are made, the situation may come to a boil very soon. And people wonder why we're so concerned about Iran getting the bomb? |
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
|