|
| |||||||
|
« Social engineering rampant |
Blog Home Page
| Hamas seizes UN humanitarian aid »
February 5, 2009 Slop about hogs from a prize boorSeveral blogs have featured this clip of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. testifying before the House .Judiciary Committee that hog producers are a greater threat to the United States than Osama Bin Laden. What interested me is that during his Kennedy also claimed that every public official in North Carolina has been corrupted by the pork industry! The environmentalist lawyer's evidence for this sweeping charge was an editorial he recalled in a Raleigh newspaper, "although he also said there may be some exceptions" How gracious of him. At first I thought that perhaps Mr. Kennedy was confusing his brands of pork. While we certainly have too many corrupt government officials down here, pork barrel spending on causes near and dear to the state Democrat party are more to blame than any activities of North Carolina farmers and meat processors. A little research, however, shows that Kennedy may still be smarting from the fact that the lawsuit his group Water Keepers filed in North Carolina for alleged environmental damage from large-scale hog farms was dismissed without a trial for complete lack of legal merit in March 2001.
Kennedy founded Water Keepers after he did his 800 hours of community service agreed to in his plea bargain on heroin possession charges with the Hudson River Foundation. Now when most people think of community service work in lieu of prison time for narcotic charges in New York City they picture working with the less privileged on some of the city's meaner streets, not networking with environmental activists in an office in Battery Park, but being a Kennedy does have its privileges, after all. Water Keepers has kept trying, without result, to bring suit against the large pork processors. A rundown of its efforts made in conjunction with several of the same legal forces involved in the tobacco settlement can be found here.
Like so many of his ilk, Kennedy maintains that he is all for sustainable agriculture. What that means, in effect, is both a great deal of restrictions on how farmers use their own land and much higher food prices for consumers.
|
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|