|
| |||||||
|
« How's that 'Grass Roots' effort coming, Barak? |
Blog Home Page
| No drilling on Utah public lands »
February 7, 2009 Iran: The stakes
Yesterday in the Jerusalem Post I read the interview John Bolton gave to Ruthie Blum Leibowitz which I consider the most important thing I have ever read in the Jerusalem Post and I sent it to dozens of friends and addresses. I got no reaction. Nothing. Why? Am I hallucinating, or is everyone else in denial?
I thought that John Bolton's interview could be compared to George F. Kennan's "long telegram" in 1946 or Samuel Huntington's 1993 article in Foreign Affairs on the Clash of Civilizations. The former set the containment policies towards the USSR for half a century, the latter is still being debated. Yet I got no response. What is going on? Perhaps it is not so obvious to people in the US and Europe that we have come to the end of the road and the time of decision about Iran is now. We in Israel are painfully aware that three days from now we will elect leaders who will have to make the crucial decisions about the survival of this country. How come John Bolton is the only one who understands that? What is the most difficult part to swallow? Is it the very idea that Iran is capable of initiating a nuclear war to which Bolton says:
Or is it that Israel has no choice but to act regardless of what the US thinks? Bolton:
Even the part about Ahmadinejad not being the only problem is revealing:
Yet despite the economic crisis Americans must realize that, as Netanyahu said at Davos, Iran is more important. That is why when I get to the voting booth on Tuesday I will cast my vote for the party that has put Iran on top of its priorities.
|
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
|