UN Human Rights Council spends $23 million on ceiling art

Ethel C. Fenig
This Fox News report on the $23,000,000 ceiling mural at the UN Human Rights Council's European headquarters tells you all that is necessary about this agency headed by that role model of human rights, Libya.  Yes, you read that correctly--$23 million. Yes, headed by Libya. 
 
The U.N. Human Rights Council, frequently accused of coddling some of the world's most repressive governments, threw itself a party in Geneva Tuesday that featured the unveiling of a $23 million mural paid for in part with foreign aid funds.


In a ceremony attended by U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, Spanish artist Miquel Barcelo told the press that his 16,000-square-foot ceiling artwork reminded him of "an image of the world dripping toward the sky" — but it reminded critics of money slipping out of relief coffers.

(snip)


Ban himself praised the piece and thanked Barcelo for putting his "unique talents to work in the service of the world." The artwork will soar above the Human Rights Council's chambers at U.N.'s European headquarters in Geneva, which may soon undergo a $1 billion renovation — but only after a $1.9 billion facelift of the U.N.'s New York offices is completed.


Oh sure, the usual critics of this less than august agency voiced their usual complaints; that the UN Human Rights Council should uh, well, guarantee human rights.  But what do they know from Art and its importance?


"In Spain there's a controversy because they took money out of the foreign aid budget — took money from starving children in Africa — and spent it on colorful stalactites," said Hillel Neuer, executive director of U.N. Watch.

(snip)


Spain's conservative opposition party blasted the government for diverting money from projects to alleviate poverty in poorer countries, though the government insisted the funding for Barcelo's work was kept separate.

(snip)


Meanwhile, international humanitarian groups pleaded with the human rights panel to take time out from their party to address the worsening human rights "catastrophe" in the Congo, where the government is fighting a deadly battle with several rebel groups.

"Mass displacement, killings and sexual violence — involving hundreds of thousands of victims, if not more — require an urgent response," according to a statement issued jointly Tuesday by Freedom House and U.N. Watch.


But the Human Rights Council is defending human rights, it is just that the critics are too narrow minded, not diverse enough to appreciate other cultures.  The Human Rights Council, following the lead of its parent organization the UN itself, devotes most of its sessions to blasting Israel and the US while asking the US for still more money to fund its operations.

Yes, that is their definition of human rights.


And thus they have diverted money from what they consider unnecessary, wasteful projects.  For instance:


Congo has been off the radar at the Human Rights Council, which removed its monitor from the African country in March when the Congolese government and a group of neighboring nations applied pressure on the council to expel the monitor.


"When the Human Rights Council was established two years ago there were about 12 or so monitors, and gradually one after another has been scrapped," said Neuer. "The other ones are all on the chopping block."


Violence is worsening in the country, where an estimated 4 million people have been killed in the past 10 years and tens of thousands have been displaced in recent months.

"The [Lord's Resistance Army] leader, Joseph Kony, is continuing his brutal and abusive tactics," said Georgette Gagnon, Africa director at Human Rights Watch. "The U.S. and U.K., along with the U.N. and governments in the region, should actively work together to apprehend LRA leaders wanted by the [International Criminal Court]."



(snip)


Human rights groups — and U.N. officials themselves — have criticized the peacekeeping force for failing to protect civilians in places like Kiwanja, where at least 20 people were killed this week.


The 17,000-man U.N. deployment is already the U.N.'s largest peacekeeping commitment, but is restricted by tough rules of engagement and has a massive territory to cover. Congo is the size of Western Europe, and North Kivu, where the fighting is centered, is one-and-a-half times the size of France.


But if you should decide to be part of the world dripping to the sky by gazing upward at this $23,000,000  wonder and develop a pain in your uh, neck, this being a human rights agency, they might be able to help you.  And if you criticize Israel and the US, you're sure to get extra care.


And to get some accurate information beyond the self glorifying UN press releases, go here    to UN Watch.  Maybe the tragic victims in the Congo and elsewhere can finally get some help. 

This Fox News report on the $23,000,000 ceiling mural at the UN Human Rights Council's European headquarters tells you all that is necessary about this agency headed by that role model of human rights, Libya.  Yes, you read that correctly--$23 million. Yes, headed by Libya. 
 
The U.N. Human Rights Council, frequently accused of coddling some of the world's most repressive governments, threw itself a party in Geneva Tuesday that featured the unveiling of a $23 million mural paid for in part with foreign aid funds.


In a ceremony attended by U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, Spanish artist Miquel Barcelo told the press that his 16,000-square-foot ceiling artwork reminded him of "an image of the world dripping toward the sky" — but it reminded critics of money slipping out of relief coffers.

(snip)


Ban himself praised the piece and thanked Barcelo for putting his "unique talents to work in the service of the world." The artwork will soar above the Human Rights Council's chambers at U.N.'s European headquarters in Geneva, which may soon undergo a $1 billion renovation — but only after a $1.9 billion facelift of the U.N.'s New York offices is completed.


Oh sure, the usual critics of this less than august agency voiced their usual complaints; that the UN Human Rights Council should uh, well, guarantee human rights.  But what do they know from Art and its importance?


"In Spain there's a controversy because they took money out of the foreign aid budget — took money from starving children in Africa — and spent it on colorful stalactites," said Hillel Neuer, executive director of U.N. Watch.

(snip)


Spain's conservative opposition party blasted the government for diverting money from projects to alleviate poverty in poorer countries, though the government insisted the funding for Barcelo's work was kept separate.

(snip)


Meanwhile, international humanitarian groups pleaded with the human rights panel to take time out from their party to address the worsening human rights "catastrophe" in the Congo, where the government is fighting a deadly battle with several rebel groups.

"Mass displacement, killings and sexual violence — involving hundreds of thousands of victims, if not more — require an urgent response," according to a statement issued jointly Tuesday by Freedom House and U.N. Watch.


But the Human Rights Council is defending human rights, it is just that the critics are too narrow minded, not diverse enough to appreciate other cultures.  The Human Rights Council, following the lead of its parent organization the UN itself, devotes most of its sessions to blasting Israel and the US while asking the US for still more money to fund its operations.

Yes, that is their definition of human rights.


And thus they have diverted money from what they consider unnecessary, wasteful projects.  For instance:


Congo has been off the radar at the Human Rights Council, which removed its monitor from the African country in March when the Congolese government and a group of neighboring nations applied pressure on the council to expel the monitor.


"When the Human Rights Council was established two years ago there were about 12 or so monitors, and gradually one after another has been scrapped," said Neuer. "The other ones are all on the chopping block."


Violence is worsening in the country, where an estimated 4 million people have been killed in the past 10 years and tens of thousands have been displaced in recent months.

"The [Lord's Resistance Army] leader, Joseph Kony, is continuing his brutal and abusive tactics," said Georgette Gagnon, Africa director at Human Rights Watch. "The U.S. and U.K., along with the U.N. and governments in the region, should actively work together to apprehend LRA leaders wanted by the [International Criminal Court]."



(snip)


Human rights groups — and U.N. officials themselves — have criticized the peacekeeping force for failing to protect civilians in places like Kiwanja, where at least 20 people were killed this week.


The 17,000-man U.N. deployment is already the U.N.'s largest peacekeeping commitment, but is restricted by tough rules of engagement and has a massive territory to cover. Congo is the size of Western Europe, and North Kivu, where the fighting is centered, is one-and-a-half times the size of France.


But if you should decide to be part of the world dripping to the sky by gazing upward at this $23,000,000  wonder and develop a pain in your uh, neck, this being a human rights agency, they might be able to help you.  And if you criticize Israel and the US, you're sure to get extra care.


And to get some accurate information beyond the self glorifying UN press releases, go here    to UN Watch.  Maybe the tragic victims in the Congo and elsewhere can finally get some help.