|
||||||||
|
« Obama's brags his 'Cap and Trade' plan will 'bankrupt' coal plant builders |
Blog Home Page
| Gloves Come off in Idaho (It's About Time!) »
November 02, 2008 Obama - the two dimensional president
Mark Steyn is one of freedom's treasures. Funny, provocative, fearless, and with a pitch perfect sense of what matters to the reader, Steyn's latest is a real gem of a column.
He riffs off of a story out of Tokyo where some nutcase wanted permission to marry a character out of a comic book: In Tokyo last week, over a thousand people signed a new petition asking the Japanese government to permit marriages between human beings and cartoon characters. “I am no longer interested in three dimensions. I would even like to become a resident of the two-dimensional world,” explained Taichi Takashita. “Therefore, at the very least, would it be possible to legally authorize marriage with a two-dimensional character?” Steyn offers a brilliant counterpoint to Obama's redistributive ideas - a paragraph that should be plastered on the statue of liberty, the Constitution, and anywhere else we need reminding what freedom means: The Senator and his doting Obots in the media have gone to great lengths to obscure what Barack Obama does when he’s not being a symbol: his v oting record, his friends, his patrons, his life outside the soft-focus memoirs is deemed non-relevant to the general hopey-changey vibe. But occasionally we get a glimpse. The offhand aside to Joe the Plumber about “spreading the wealth around” was revealing because it suggests a crude redistributive view of “social justice.” Yet the nimble Hope-a-Dope sidestepper brushed it aside, telling a crowd in Raleigh that next John McCain will be “accusing me of being a secret communist because I shared my toys in kindergarten.” Under Obama and the Democrats, the state will determine what is "fair" when it comes to your property. They will decide whether you have more than your "fair share" and take it from you and spread it around. Obama calls our resistance to this anti-democratic idea "selfish." He is making a moral judgment on the perfectly utilitarian idea of private property being sacrosanct in a free society and that government better have a damn good reason to ask us to part with some of it. Fund programs for the needy? Fine, I'll pay taxes for that. But taking from someone who has more and giving it to someone for the sole reason that they have less (not that they need it to survive) is an open invitation for the many to grab what they can from the few for no other reason than they have been enabled to do so. That, as Steyn points out, is the real radicalism that Obama and the Democrats represent. |
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|