|
||||||||
|
« Obama wants more money from his believers |
Blog Home Page
| Mumbai death toll tops 170 »
November 29, 2008 Franken wants recount to continue until he wins
Ed Morrissey updates us on the Minnesota senate race and the failed efforts of Al Franken to have rejected ballots that were not originaly counted to be tallied.
And why were these ballots rejected? Some people voted for both candidates. Others were not signed as required by law of all absentee ballots. Still others made no selection at all or their intent was unclear. No matter. Al Franken wants to keep the recount going until enough votes are found or stolen to give him the election. And he's willing to go to court and perhaps all the way to the Senate itself to make sure that happens:
There are 12,000 absentee votes that were rejected - Secretary of State Ritchie (D) says some were set aside for illegitimate reasons - as well as another 5,000 or so that are being challenged. But the law matters little if the subjective examination of the votes can be finagled to give him the election. Failing that, Franken has a friend in Harry Reid:
If all else fails, Franken can get Democrats in the Senate to name him Senator no matter what the vote totals are. Imagine a scenario where the Democrats win the Georgia runoff on December 2. That would give them 59 members - one short of a filibuster proof majority. That would put a whole different spin on any challenge Franken would bring before the new Senate next January. A decision in his favor by Senate Democrats (it would take a simple majority to certify Franken the winner) is not impossible - especially if Franken can weep about "disenfranchised" voters. I wouldn't put it past Reid or any other Democrat to pull an undemocratic stunt like that.
|
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|