|
| |||||||
|
« Insight into Candidates through their gifts to charity |
Blog Home Page
| More ACORN fraud (What Else is New?) »
September 14, 2008 The all-too predictable NY Times hit piece on PalinThe Times gave it the full treatment; front page above the fold, ominous headlines, and a completely misleading lede. In a 4500 word hit peice, the Times blows many things out of proportion while minimizing or dismissing Palin's accomplishments. Jennifer Rubin has read it and analyzed it so that you don't have to:
The "point," Jennifer, is to hint at wrongdoing, stretch the truth, exaggerate the negative, and hope that those few Times readers who aren't aware of their shocking bias will be disposed to think ill of Mrs. Palin. But Rubin identifies the real problem with the article; there simply isn't anything of substance that the reporters can point to that either disqualifies Mrs. Palin from high office or even makes her appear different than many politicians and, in some areas, shows her in a better light than most. With so many reporters prowling around Wasilla and Anchorage, if this is the best the Times can do, Palin doesn't have much to worry about. |
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
|