|
| |||||||
|
« Memory Lane: 'Lynching' Franklin Raines and How Fannie Mae Isn't 'Broke' |
Blog Home Page
| Family told Obama not to wear bracelet with son's name »
September 28, 2008 Agreement reached on Mother of all BailoutsNo matter where you come down on this bailout, you are going to have to deal with the fact that the federal government is, to a large extent, taking over a big chunk of the financial services industry in America. We, the taxpayer, will become part owners of these financial firms who are in trouble. And not just because of the massive amount of money we will be giving to these companies. A provision in the bailout bill requires that firms participating in the bailout issue warrants so that the government can obtain non voting shares of stock. This was at the insistence of the Democrats who also wrung some other concessions from Treasury Secretary Paulson and the Republicans: · The money would be dispersed in segments, with Paulson receiving $250 billion immediately, $100 billion upon White House certification of its necessity and the final $350 billion only after Congress has been given 15 days to object. The Democrats gave up the handout to ACORN and the nightmare idea of empowering banruptcy judges with the ability to alter mortgage contracts for consumers (the confusion would have thrown the court system into chaos say many experts). Other details of the bill will become available once all the i's are dotted and t's crossed. Pelosi has promised to post it on the web for 24 hours before the vote. The Democrats outnumbered Republicans in the talks 9-2. Why was that? From 3 p.m. to 5:30 p.m., Conrad and other lawmakers met with Paulson around a massive table in Pelosi's conference room under an ornate portrait of Abraham Lincoln. Among lawmakers, Democrats outnumbered Republicans nine to two, an imbalance that so irritated Paulson that he called and complained to Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.), according to three GOP sources familiar with the call. Ain't "bipartisanship" grand? It appears to me that although there will probably be a few holdouts in the House GOP and a handful in the Senate, the rest of the Republicans are falling into line, terrified at what might happen if the markets open tomorrow with no agreement in hand. Paulson upped the ante during the negotiations by referring to a Treasury Department report that Wall Street might lose a third of its value next week if no agreement is reached. But they're not trying to scare anyone, are they? As part owner of JP Morgan, do you think they'll let me use the company jet? |
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|