Top 10 Reasons Obama shouldn't be President

1. Barack Obama's foreign policy is dangerous, naïve, and betrays a profound misreading of history. For at least the past five years, Democrats and liberals have said our standing in the international community has suffered from a "cowboy" or "go-it-alone" foreign policy. While politicians with favorable views of our president have been elected in Germany, Italy, France, and elsewhere, Barack Obama is giving cause to make our allies even more nervous. This past Sunday's Washington Post reported, "European officials are increasingly concerned that Sen. Barack Obama's campaign pledge to begin direct talks with Iran on its nuclear program without preconditions could potentially rupture U.S. relations with key European allies early in a potential Obama administration."

Barack Obama's stance toward Iran is as troubling as it is dangerous. By stating and maintaining that he would negotiate with Iran, "without preconditions," and within his first year of office, he will give credibility to, and reward for his intransigence, the head of state of the world's chief sponsor of terrorism...

2. Barack Obama's Iraq policy will hand al-Qaeda a victory and undercut our entire position in the Middle East, while at the same time put a huge source of oil in the hands of terrorists. Barack Obama brags on his website that "In January 2007, he introduced legislation in the Senate to remove all of our combat troops from Iraq by March 2008." His website further states that "Obama will immediately begin to remove our troops from Iraq. He will remove one to two combat brigades each month, and have all of our combat brigades out of Iraq within 16 months." This, at the very time our greatest successes in Iraq have taken place. And yet, as Gen. David Petraeus has stated (along with other military experts from Michael O'Hanlon at the Brookings Institution to members of the U.S. military), our progress in Iraq is "fragile and reversible."

Obama's post-invasion analysis of Iraq is anything but credible or consistent, leading one to even greater doubt about his strategy as commander-in-chief...

6. Obama is simply out of step with how terrorists should be handled; he would turn back the clock on how we fight terrorism, using the failed strategy of the 1990s as opposed to the post-9/11 strategy that has kept us safe. The most recent example is his support for the Supreme Court decision granting habeas-corpus rights to terrorists, including - theoretically - Osama bin Laden. When the 5-4 Supreme Court decision was delivered, Obama said, "I think the Supreme Court was right." His campaign advisers held a conference call where they claimed the Supreme Court decision was "no big deal" according to ABC News, even if applied to Osama bin Laden, because a judge would find that the U.S. has "ample grounds to hold him."

Recent Articles

• Saxby's Win: 08's Most Intellectually Pure Contest
• Keynesian borrowing won't solve our economic problems
• First lessons from the Mumbai Massacres
• It's Time to Speak Out Against The 'Mormon Boycott'
• NBER's Anomalous Recession Calls
• Products that Nobody Wants
• AP's terror photographer honored in NYC
• Canada's Conservative government faces challenge to its control
• The Obama presidency begins to emerge
• When the World Loves America

Blog Posts

• Bizarre accident
• Look Who's Ponied Up for Murtha
• Chambliss credits Palin with victory
• In Chicago, it's unions first, snow removal second
• Think Tanks warn Obama of Iranian threat
• Toronto cracks down on the threat of bottled water
• Attorney General Designate and the clemency granted FALN terrorists
• About that 'windfall profits tax' ...
• India fingers Mumbai 'mastermind'
• Bill Clinton Puts Global Warming Threat Ahead of Terrorism

Monthly Archives

• December 2008
• November 2008
• October 2008
• September 2008
• More...