|
||||||||
|
« Poll Predicts Hillary Landslide in West Virginia |
Blog Home Page
| Obama as 'apostate' »
May 12, 2008 Unbelievable Spin in Time Article on al-Sadr's 'Cease Fire'It just doesn't get any more blatantly biased than this. Anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr has agreed to a cease fire in Sadr city and correspondent Mark Kukis writes the story as if al-Sadr is "the winner."
Why do you suppose Kukis doesn't mention that Iraqi army forces can now patrol areas previously occupied by al-Sadr's Mahdi army? Why do you think he found it difficult to mention that while the Mahdi may carry rifles, they must turn in all heavy and medium weapons? Does that sound a like a "victory" to you? It gets more unbelievable here:
Has this guy been asleep for the last month? "Fought Iraqi forces to a standstill?" That must be what the New York Times is talking about here:
This was after the press declared another "victory" for al-Sadr when he supposedly announced a cease fire in Basra last month. The only problem for Mookie was that the government did not agree to a cease fire and kept up the rout of his militiamen until today, they are gone, the Iraqi army is in control, and the correspondent for Time Magazine is exposed as a shill for the enemy. Why didn't Kukis report the current situation in Basra? It didn't fit the narrative of his story; the left wing infatuation with "revolutionaries" like al-Sadr no matter how brutal or thuggish they are. As long as they are fighting America, they are heroes. Hence, chalk up another fake "victory" for al-Sadr whose crumbling militia is matched only by his crumbling political position. Some "victor," huh? |
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|