May 20, 2008

The Rule Book for Criticizing Obama

Peggy Shapiro
Barack Obama needs to issue a rule book for exactly what criticism opponents are allowed to make.

Rule 1  Don't criticize family no matter who they are or what they do.

Although his wife Michelle is an active member of his campaign and a virulent critic of other candidates, she must not be made an issue in the election.  "The GOP, should I be the nominee, can say whatever they want to say about me, my track record," Obama said. "If they think that they're going to try to make Michelle an issue in this campaign, they should be careful because that I find unacceptable, the notion that you start attacking my wife or my family." To criticize Michelle is not part of the normal political fray, but a violation of the sanctity of family. Michelle Obama has immunity from condemnation and free reign to denigrate the country and Obama's opponents.

Rule 2  Don't criticize any policy that the candidate might have even if he is not mentioned by name.

The opposition must not challenge Obama's plan to meet face-to-face with state sponsors of terror, even if the challenge does not mention the Senator by name. A Democratic firestorm broke out when President Bush told an Israeli Knesset audience that negotiating with Iran's President, who has repeatedly committed himself to the destruction of Israel, is the false comfort of appeasement. Obama, whose policy is just that sort of false comfort, attacked the speech as "a false political attack" 
launched on foreign soil. Although Democrats have been critical of the U.S. on foreign soil (Obama's recently dismissed foreign policy advisor Samantha Power is just the first that comes to mind.), partisan politics past our shores is not protocol.

Rule 3  Don't imply that Obama's stunning rise to power was the result of anything less than divine intervention.

As Bill Clinton discovered, referring to Obama's unprecedented rise from an undistinguished state senator, with a short stop in the U.S. Senate, to candidate for the most powerful position in the world was "a fairytale." Of course, Clinton did not imply that Obama conjured magical powers, but that unusual circumstances were in play. The "fairytale" remark was distorted and regurgitated as a play of the "race card." There is no more damning or frightening epithet than to be called a racist. 

Rule 4  Don't examine any of Obama's anti-American, racist, terrorist, or criminal associates.
It's out of bounds to criticize a public member of his campaign in a key foreign policy position. Criticism of Obama's associations with Reverend Wright, domestic terrorist Bill Ayers and indicted influence peddler Tony Rezko are characterized as "witch hunt" and "guilt by association."  The critic is stained by association with two of America's darkest periods in history: the hysterical unfairness of America's Salem Trials and Joe McCarthy's prosecution of Americans for their "suspected" associations with Communists.

So let's clarify the rules for the general election so that Republicans are not labeled as destroyers of families, indecent purveyors of false attacks, racists, or McCarthyites. Don't make negative mention of Obama's wife, his policies, his inexperience, or his associations.

What's left? The GOP had better contact the Obama campaign to issue a list of permissible topics.

Comments

I would hope that the 527's will be able to do what McCain, in all his magnanamous glory, will not do, and that is to ignore all the Obama election rules, and thoroughly "vet" this "messiah" for what he truly represents.....the emptiest suit on the planet.

I think that ....

Obama reminds me of telephone and/or internet sex,...
all talk.

This is in line with a brilliant monologue Rush Limbaugh had on his show Friday: (I hope it's permissible to post. The URL is http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_051608/content/01125112.member.html)

***
Not only can we not mention [Barack Obama's] ears...
We can't talk about his mother. We can't talk about his father.
We can't talk about his grandmother unless he does, brings her up as a "typical white person."
We can't talk about his wife, can't talk about his preacher, ... can't talk about his voting record, can't talk about his religion.
We can't talk about appeasement.
We can't talk about color. We can't talk about lack of color. We can't talk about race.
We can't talk about bombers and mobsters who are his friends.
We can't talk about schooling.
We can't talk about his name, "Hussein."
We can't talk about his lack of experience.
Can't talk about his income.
Can't talk about his flag pin ...
Now we can't say anything about him!
***

And that's just the way the Democrats want it. Welcome to liberal speech suppression.

http://VocalMinority.typepad.com
Jewish AND Republican?? Oy gevalt

I caught that list on Rush's show as well. My husband & I have been talking about this for a couple of weeks now. How do you run against the man when EVERY criticism is off-limits? Even McCain and his "respectful" campaign plan is doomed and I thought it was a lousy idea in the first place.

This is in line with a brilliant monologue Rush Limbaugh had on his show Friday: (I hope it's permissible to post. The URL is http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_051608/content/01125112.member.html)

***
Not only can we not mention [Barack Obama's] ears...
We can't talk about his mother. We can't talk about his father.
We can't talk about his grandmother unless he does, brings her up as a "typical white person."
We can't talk about his wife, can't talk about his preacher, ... can't talk about his voting record, can't talk about his religion.
We can't talk about appeasement.
We can't talk about color. We can't talk about lack of color. We can't talk about race.
We can't talk about bombers and mobsters who are his friends.
We can't talk about schooling.
We can't talk about his name, "Hussein."
We can't talk about his lack of experience.
Can't talk about his income.
Can't talk about his flag pin ...
Now we can't say anything about him!
***

And that's just the way the Democrats want it. Welcome to liberal speech suppression.

http://VocalMinority.typepad.com
Jewish AND Republican?? Oy gevalt

I'm afraid I don't understand what the issue is. The only thing he has stated as off limits is an attack on his family (and standing up for your family is generally and admirable quality). With everything else, he has merely criticized the criticism, so to speak. Is that no longer allowed in politics?

And please feel free to point out the error of my thinking and explain why this is an actual issue.

McCain has a military background. He might be keeping his powder dry for the time being, waiting for the right situation calling for a change in tactics.

We now have another established pattern of behavior providing meat for another SNL parody.

So, this rule book; will that be his third book? He is so busy visiting 57 states that he will be needing help coming up with a good title.

Going after Michelle might backfire. It could inspire Democrats to go after Cindy McCain, who suffers from a case of Theresa Heinz Kerry Syndrome.

Why don't we critize mccain for supporting talks with Hamas but backing down like a chicken away from it. When he became the nominee

Do people not remember how little experience G.W.Bush had before he took presidency? He had less than Obama.

Rule 1) He asked that you not personally attack his wife. While I think everyone (including Chelsea and Cindy) is fair game, this isn't such a big deal nor is it unprecedented.

Rule 2) He didn't say you can't say it. He directly attacked the disgusting rhetoric that was presented to a foreign government. Obama is nto Kerry. He will speak truth to the lies of the president and he will speak it loudly.

Rule 3) Again, he never said you can't say it. Not even close. Bill Clinton was attacked by many people for the comments surrounding the 'fairy tale' comment. Obama was not one of them.

Rule 4) Yet again, nobody said you cannot say it. You mistake fighting back with crying foul. Over and over again. But keep trying. Rezko and Ayers will not get you any traction, but I encourage you to continue in your efforts. You may be able to get more tread out of Wright, but I suspect not too much more. Increasingly large numbers of American voters have nuanced opinions about such matters and are not at all frightened that Obama will usher in the New Black Order (or whatever it is you are peddling today).

Moonbats on parade today. Intravenous coolaid users.

tseting said:
Do people not remember how little experience G.W.Bush had before he took presidency? He had less than Obama.
Huh? You mean a two term Govenor of a large state is less experience that 1 1/2 years in the Senate and absolutely no executive experience at ALL? What the hell are you smoking?
To mike m.:
As long as she is an active member of the campaign, in the arena of ideas, she is subject to the slings and arrows of politics, period.
So now the libs try to trot out chivalry to shield a virulently anti-american woman from criticism? Now (NOW?) that's irony!

BobP: So historical facts about what appeasement for Terroists and Dictators brings is now "disgusting rhetoric?" Truth hurts, huh?

Rule 1) He asked that you not personally attack his wife. While I think everyone (including Chelsea and Cindy) is fair game, this isn't such a big deal nor is it unprecedented.

Why don't you ask President Bush Mike M about precedence? How would you like to see your child's wedding picture plastered all over an internet hate site like Moveon.org next to pictures of wounded/dying soldiers in Iraq? So I guess her fathers' foreign policy means she is fair game to be denigrated and abused all over the world? You have to remember they didn't have the world wide web when Chelsea was small. Your rules are without merit. I could argue the other 3, but there is no point. Large numbers of American voters afraid of a Black President? You must be an African American who sees racism in every aspect of his life. How arrogant of you to think the rest of America wouldn't vote for someone who doesn't look like them. Big Fat Clue for you: I'm of German/Irish/French ancestry, and I would vote for Condoleeza Rice tomorrow if she would agree to run.

Do people not remember how little experience G.W.Bush had before he took presidency? He had less than Obama.

Posted by: mike m | May 20, 2008 04:51 PM
Huh? Might I bring your attention to the fact that Bush was a two term governor of one of the largest states in the union. Obama is a first term U.S. senator and a state senator with a record of voting present for most of the time he was there. Not that this is the current discussion which is about Obama's whining about what is fair game for criticism. It is my understanding that as first lady (if they should get that far) she will be both an occupant of the White House and undoubtedly a representative to the president in a number of countries. Does Obama feel Bill Clinton is fair game? Damn right. But the logic escapes liberals. Liberals who attacked Laura Bush for an accident she was in as a young girl. The Clinton's also made a request that the press lay off Chelsea when Bill was in the White House, to which they readily complied, but when one of Bush's daughters got busted for underage drinking it was all over the MSM. If you choose to run for office, you are automatically opening up your life to public scrutiny, if you don't like it, don't run.

Rule #1, mine.... Lay off Obama... he wasn't even born on US soil, but in Nyangoma-Kogelo, Kenya, Africa..... Don't look for proof.... It's been deleted from the web.... and from official Kenyan Govt files.... Donah////

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

ATsupport2.jpg