Military to seek death penalty in trial of 6 detainees

Rick Moran
The very first trial under the Military Tribunal system of justice for detainees at Guantanamo could be a capital case involving 6 terrorists charged with complicity in the 9/11 attacks on the United States:

The officials said the charges would be announced at the Pentagon as soon as Monday and were likely to include numerous war-crimes charges against the six men, including Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the former Qaeda operations chief who has described himself as the mastermind of the attacks, which killed nearly 3,000 people.

A Defense Department official said prosecutors were seeking the death penalty because “if any case warrants it, it would be for individuals who were parties to a crime of that scale.” The officials spoke anonymously because no one in the government was authorized to speak about the case.

A decision to seek the death penalty would increase the international focus on the case and present new challenges to the troubled military commission system that has yet to begin a single trial.

“The system hasn’t been able to handle the less-complicated cases it has been presented with to date,” said David Glazier, a former Navy officer who is a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles.

In addition to Mr. Mohammed, the other five to be charged include detainees officials say were coordinators and intermediaries in the plot, among them a man labeled the “20th hijacker,” who was denied entry to the United States in the month before the attacks.
There are still stumbling blocks to trying the terrorists for a capital offense. There must be a review by a senior military judge. And the Supreme Court could weigh in and scuttle the entire Tribunal idea.

But it seems clear that after years of work, Justice Department and DoD lawyers have finally settled on the best way to bring justice to at least some of the detainees. No doubt the trial - if one were held - would be extremely controversial both here and abroad. But some kind of resolution is demanded and at the moment, the military tribunal would seem the best option.
The very first trial under the Military Tribunal system of justice for detainees at Guantanamo could be a capital case involving 6 terrorists charged with complicity in the 9/11 attacks on the United States:

The officials said the charges would be announced at the Pentagon as soon as Monday and were likely to include numerous war-crimes charges against the six men, including Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the former Qaeda operations chief who has described himself as the mastermind of the attacks, which killed nearly 3,000 people.

A Defense Department official said prosecutors were seeking the death penalty because “if any case warrants it, it would be for individuals who were parties to a crime of that scale.” The officials spoke anonymously because no one in the government was authorized to speak about the case.

A decision to seek the death penalty would increase the international focus on the case and present new challenges to the troubled military commission system that has yet to begin a single trial.

“The system hasn’t been able to handle the less-complicated cases it has been presented with to date,” said David Glazier, a former Navy officer who is a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles.

In addition to Mr. Mohammed, the other five to be charged include detainees officials say were coordinators and intermediaries in the plot, among them a man labeled the “20th hijacker,” who was denied entry to the United States in the month before the attacks.
There are still stumbling blocks to trying the terrorists for a capital offense. There must be a review by a senior military judge. And the Supreme Court could weigh in and scuttle the entire Tribunal idea.

But it seems clear that after years of work, Justice Department and DoD lawyers have finally settled on the best way to bring justice to at least some of the detainees. No doubt the trial - if one were held - would be extremely controversial both here and abroad. But some kind of resolution is demanded and at the moment, the military tribunal would seem the best option.