|
| |||||||
|
« CIA Recruited Iranian Defectors |
Blog Home Page
| Al Gore: Doing good or just doing well? »
December 9, 2007 What passes for "Economic Reporting" at the Times
Great Headline:
Slowing Job Growth Seen as Ominous Sign for Economy But the Times contradicts itslef within the first two paragraphs-journalism at its best. The nation gained a modest 94,000 jobs in November, the Labor Department reported yesterday, pulling back considerably from the previous month in the clearest sign yet that the American economy was headed for a substantial slowdown. BUT WAIT....if one reads past the scary headline and dire first sentence we come to the contradiction which painst a more nuanced and optimistiv view of the economy But the jobs report, a much-anticipated indicator of the health of the economy, also provided some comfort that the United States had not slipped into a recession and might not be weakening as rapidly as some experts feared. With business leaders expressing uncertainty about the prospects for further growth, analysts said, a better view of the direction of the economy was not likely to emerge until next year. For the Times, good economic news is secondary to doom and gloom about the Bush economy - an economy that Larry Kudlow explains is still going strong after 6 years of growth: Here are the facts: Americans are working. The 4.7 percent unemployment number remains at an historical low. On a three-month rolling basis, the U.S. economy has added over 100,000 jobs. Meanwhile, the household job count shows that an average of 303,000 jobs have been added in the last three months. This is noteworthy because it suggests that the job market is turning around. The Bush Boom - most underreported story so far this century. |
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
|