|
| |||||||
|
« A Harried Screed from Harry Reid |
Blog Home Page
| 12 Days of Christmas, Iraqi style »
December 21, 2007 Lakotas leaving?
A group claiming to represent the Lakota (aka Teton, Tetonwan) people, part of the Sioux, announces via press release their independence from the United States. Details of any official standing of the press release and group are less than skimpy.
The news was picked up eagerly overseas (e.g., Radio Netherlands, U.K. Telegraph, AFP and Malaysia Sun ) faster than at home, although USA Today and local/regional media like the Rapid City Journal had coverage that went beyond PR transcription. That last paper quotes Russell Means:
The United States fought its bloodiest war to defend its territorial integrity. Means is a career left wing activist (and Hollywood actor), in other words a publicity business veteran. Means is playing to anti-American leftists in world media and politics, advocates of "soft power" with their own agenda. The initial reaction suggests that he will have a willing and credulous audience, eager for pictures of poverty-stricken Native American, victims of a racist "occupation" of land that is rightfully theirs. It doesn't take a lot of imagination to see harmonic convergence looming in the fantasies of the international left. Their publicity campaign is coming. It deserves to be laughed away. Blogger Steveforprez for example, offers his sympathetic but firm voice:
There is a vast industry of activist groups, NGOs, financial interests (what do you suppose Geogre Soros thinks of this publicity campaign?), and governments which will love this "cause." Imagine the potential for "solidarity"! The nation state is the primary rival of the forces of supranational organizations like the EU, and those of world governance. Plenty of people want to see national solidarity dissolve, and with it the nation state.
Just a little context. |
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
|