|
| |||||||
|
« Clinton pal reported seeking Wall Street Journal |
Blog Home Page
| A typical British name - like Jack or Mohammed »
June 6, 2007 Tom Friedman: rescue Hamas
Leave it to the New York Times. Just as the Palestinians turn against Hamas, their lead foreign affairs columnist advocates Israel reach out to Hamas and rescue it from its own follies.
Aside from the absurdity and odiousness of reaching out to a group that advocates not just the destruction of Israel but the killing of Jews around the world (has Freidman read their charter, has he followed their propaganda, has he learned of their many attacks against Israeli civilians?), why would he advocate a rescue line being thrown to Hamas when it is on the ropes? There has been a spate of news stories regarding increasing dissatisfaction among the Palestinians with Hamas. In this MEMRI dispatch, it is noted that Palestinians find the clashes between Hamas and Fatah and the increasing lawlessness in Gaza and the West Bank abhorrent and that Gazans are longing for the return of the Israelis. From the MEMRI report:
Mahmoud Abbas has said that the Palestinians are on the brink of a civil war and such "infighting is worse than Israeli military rule", implicitly acknowledging that Israeli rule at least brought some degree of order and security from the Hobbesian world Hamas has created. Even the Druze who live on the Golan Heights (formerly held by Syria) admit that friends and relatives who live in Syria tell them how lucky they are to live under Israeli laws and to have the freedoms that Syrians are denied. One Druze expressed relief that he does not live in Syria: Although Suleiman has never been to Syria, he said he was scared by stories from friends permitted to study there.
Surely, Tom Friedman, famously well-informed on the Middle East, is aware that Hamas "won" the election because too many candidates ran in local elections and the split votes led to the Hamas victory. Had the Palestinians ran a better campaign, Hamas might never have won. It is at best unclear that Hamas truly is representative of the views and desires of the Palestinians. As Hamas focuses on launching missiles and killing innocent Israeli civilians, its negligence and incompetence toward its own people have created a situation that is evolving toward a view among the Palestinians that terror "does not pay". The lack of international recognition and funding has hurt the Hamas regime (incidentally, aid to the Palestinian people themselves has soared) and people are turning against Hamas. This the esteemed New York Times columnist Tom Friedman for some reason finds distressing. Instead of putting a nail into the heart of Hamas, he wants to put them on life support and rejuvenate them A few years ago, Tom Friedman (and the New York Times) introduced to the world the "Saudi Peace Plan" that called for Israel to pull back to the pre-Six Day War lines (otherwise called the "Auschwitz borders") and called for a return of Palestinian refugees into Israel. The plan was pushed for months by Friedman and the Times but faded. Now the Saudis and others are again floating the "Peace Plan". Friedman's ego appears to be stoked by this development. Now he wants to push for a Hamas Peace Plan. Methinks Friedman feels frustrated merely being a Pulitzer-prize winning columnist at the Times. Perhaps he has reached a time in his life where he asks himself, "Where do I go now that I have reached the pinnacle of journalism?" I think his dream is to be Secretary of State.
|
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
|