Curious omission

Ed Lasky
Today's New York Times editorial on Libby case omits Richard Armitage's name:
What we still do not know is whether a government official used Ms. Wilson's name despite knowing that she worked undercover. That is a serious offense, which could have put her and all those who had worked with her in danger.

Today's New York Times editorial on Libby case omits Richard Armitage's name:
What we still do not know is whether a government official used Ms. Wilson's name despite knowing that she worked undercover. That is a serious offense, which could have put her and all those who had worked with her in danger.