|
| |||||||
|
« The attack on KSFO |
Blog Home Page
| More questions about NCIS »
January 16, 2007 Secret agreement between Isarel and Syria? (updated)The Israeli paper Haaretz is reporting tonight that secret understanding were reached between representatives of Israel and Syria during a series of secret meetings that occurred in Europe between September 2004 and July 2006. The main points are:
This report so far has appeared only in Haaretz. One has to wonder about the reliability of the report since it has not been confirmed elsewhere and because Syria's actions during last summer's war in Lebanon seem to indicate that their alliance with Iran and the Shiite Hezbollah seems to be as strong or stronger than ever. Of course, unofficial talks and meeting of the sort outlined in this article probably happen somewhat frequently (indeed, such unofficial talks led to the Oslo Accords)-even with foes. There are always issues that can be discussed and short term deals cut that are mutually beneficial and serve the interests of both parties. However, a further question arises-as they do whenever leaks of this sort happen: Who benefits from the release of this story? Israeli Prime Minister Olmert and his Kadima party have seen their popularity and support crumble in the last year. The poor performance of Israel against Lebanon has taken its toll, as have problems following the pullout in Gaza. Corruption investigations are hounding Olmert and his administration. What better way to show progress than revealing that "understandings" have been reached with one of Israel's most dangerous foes that might lead to a peace agreement? A more positive spin on these talks than they warrant might be a ploy to bolster the Olmert administration at a time when it most is in need. Haaretzbeinga liberal newspaper and one that supports peace overtures-would be a very willing media source that would accept the veracity of this story and promote it. Syrian sources also seem to offer support for the article. How would Syria benefit from a release of this story? The UN investigation of the murder of former Lebanese Prime Minister Hariri is heating up this week: an upcoming vote in Lebanon will decide whether to support the investigation. Syria faces extreme pressure, as conspirators behind the murder reportedly include members of the Assad ruling family. Basher Assad, the current leader of Syria, may be hoping to deflate some of the pressure against him by appearing to be willing to entertain peace overtures. The quid pro quo would be that the Hariri investigation be stalled or ended. In the bazaar culture of the Middle East, tempting the world's powers with the hope of a peace agreement between Israel and Syria may just be enough to put the investigation on ice. A good trade for the Assad regime. Assad may also be willing to send up a trial balloon. One of the divisions that have rent the Arab world is that between the Shi'a and the Sunni versions of Islam. While Syria is majority Sunni (80%), the ruling Assad regime is Alawite, a sect that many consider a branch of Shiism. Saudi Arabia, as the leader of the Sunni world and as protectors of Sunni Islam's holiest two sites (Mecca and Medina), has a vested interest in eroding the alliance between the Shiites in Iran and Syria. The Assad regime might wonder what the Saudis (and America) would offer in the way of recompense if Syria would break from its alliance with Iran, and thus severely disrupt the ascendancy of Shiite power in the Arab world. Stay tuned as the story develops.
Update: The Jerusalem Post reports reports that both sides deny it.
|
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|