|
||||||||
|
« College Degrees, Social Status, and Affirmative Action |
Blog Home Page
| "Left Fascists" are fascists too... »
January 10, 2007 Coincidence or pattern?A friend notes that The New York Sun article today about the dropping of FBI investigations into intelligence leaks (mentioned in an earlier blog) contains lots of interesting news. (emphasis supplied)
He and I agree that In normal parlance that means: OGC and DOJ get together and agree that there will be no consequences for stonewalling, so the FBI is hamstrung in proceeding further. Unless of course the target is attractive for DOJ.Sometimes the target is. Sometimes it isn't. And the seriousness of the inquiry and the cooperation of other agencies also is remarkably variable. My friend and I, both with experience in the government, had the same interpretation of this part of the article:
It is hardly surprising that Dion remains mum. Dion handled the Sandy Berger case and as the report just released reveals he showed a singular lack of curiosity. And then finally, there is this:
Dion seems in sum to have been incurious about the Berger case, the multiple CIA and DoS leaks, but showed significant interest in the non-leak case of non-classified information Plame case. .And--miracolo!--the DoS and CIA who were unwilling to be forthcoming in the real leak cases seemed to be more than willing to cooperate on Plame. So, my friend and I agree that Dion can do the job when he's motivated. It's just a matter of figuring out what motivates him. For example, he was very motivated to go after Rove/Libby. There is no indication that the CIA and DoS ,which were unavailing to assist in the actual leak cases documented by the NY Sun, cooperated fully with the DoJ in the Plame case . In fact, in the case of the State Department we know they cooperated so fully with Dion that they kept from the President the very important news that the Deputy Secretary Armitage was the Novak source. That news would have ended the move to appoint a special prosecutor and it most certainly have ended years of harassment to White House officials and staffers and feverish coverage which implied the President and his men were willing to jeopardize national security and the lives of undercover intelligence agents for political gain, We are to believe, I suppose, that it is mere coincidence that when leaks are harmful to the Administration there is no inter agency cooperation and no DoJ motivation to pursue the matters and when it is harmful to the Administration to pursue non-leaks and to sit on information helpful to the Administration, everyone in the bureaucracy goes out full bore. At what point does repeated coincidence become a pattern? my friend asks. I don't have an answer to that. |
Recent ArticlesBlog Posts
|
|