Last week I wrote an article for American Thinker on Al Gore's Global Warming Crusade. I mentioned in that piece, which drew some unhappy response both from skeptics of global warming and advocates of the cause, that much of Gore's analysis amounted to anecdotal 'evidence', clearly not meeting any test of scientific rigor. Today, comes news that undercuts some of that anecdotal 'evidence'. In essence, the global warming argument is as follows: 1.    We are expelling greenhouse gases into the environment, increasing CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere 2.     The earth is slowly warming 3.     # 1 and #2 above are positively correlated 4.    The increasing global temperatures will cause all manner of bad things to happen. One of them is already occurring— an increase in the number and intensity of hurricanes. Most of the dispute over global warming concern #3 and #4 above. In particular, the dispute...(Read Full Post)