Just who were those Lamont voters opposing Senator Joseph Lieberman in last week's Connecticut primary?  Angry kiddies using blogs and online activism to fuel their post adolescent rebellion?  Not quite according to an analysis to be published in this week's New York Times Sunday Magazine by staff writer Matt Bai. Instead they were 'exasperated and ideologically disappointed baby boomers' who felt 'duped' by their party's move to the center during the Clinton years, and later found their 'icon' in Howard Dean. These 'older lapsed liberals,' he opines, grew up marching against the Vietnam war and now, beyond the Iraq issue, are 'yearning for a more confrontational brand of opposition on all fronts, for something resembling the black—and—white moral choices of the 1960s, that more broadly animated Lamont's insurgency.' In other words the voters were not for Lamont and his ideas, they voted for him because Lamont was not Lieberman, and he was "an...(Read Full Post)