|
| |||||||
|
« A country with no future destroys its past |
Blog Home Page
| The May Day protest continues »
April 30, 2006 London Times: We may have to bomb IranRod Liddle at the London Times says the West may have to bomb Natanz, the place where even the Mullahs and the UN now admit that Iran is enriching uranium for nuclear bombs.
Why pick on Iran? Why not bomb India, Pakistan, France and Israel for their nuclear capacities?
Ahmadinejad with nukes is different from Jacques Chirac with nukes — and we don't have to like Chirac. The only question is, does Jacques Chirac hunger for holy martyrdom for himself and his people? And the obvious French answer is: C'est imb�cile, tu idiot plein de merde. But not old Mahmoud. Every day he gives out the same message: Israel and the West must be destroyed. Martyrdom is the answer. Khomeinist Iran must become the new superpower, leading fundamentalist Islam to world conquest. If you really want to know the mental space these folks inhabit, take a look at this AP photo of "Dancers performing as they hold capsules of uranium hexafluoride during a ceremony in Mashad, Iran, on Tuesday." Then tell yourself they can't be serious. How many times does Ahmadinejad have to say it? Mad Mahmoud is sitting on top of the oil spigot of the world, the Persian Gulf. If you think that's a greedy and selfish thing to say, stop driving right now. Don't turn on your lights, your TV, radio, and internet. Throw out your PC, and stop taking aspirin and other medicines. Don't use anything made out of plastic. They all use Gulf oil. And if you want somebody to blame, look at the way the West has castrated itself. We have extirpated our own energy sources to please Green zealots. When the Left goes ballistic over any military attack on Natanz, remind them of exactly who has made us so dependent on Hitlerite fanatics. Liddle writes:
James Lewis 4 30 06 |
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
|