|
| |||||||
|
« The petulant right |
Blog Home Page
| The recusal trap »
October 6, 2005 Miers critics not elitistsPundits who oppose Harriet Miers' nomination to the Supreme Court are being tagged as elitists. That accusation came up twice yesterday on the FOX Special Report with Brit Hume. First, during his Grapevine segment. Hume pointed out that Miers' critics Bill Kristol, Charles Krauthammer, David Frum, Laura Ingraham and George Will all attended Ivy League schools. Then, during the panel discussion with Fred Barnes, Mort Kondracke, and Mara Liasson, Hume raised the issue again. The following is a partial transcript available through LexisNexis:
One does not expect NPR's Mara Liasson to possess a better understanding of conservative opinion than Fred Barnes, but yesterday she did.
Indeed, a quick review of conservatives' most—preferred Supreme Court nominees proves Ms. Liasson to be quite right. Washington Post bios on the leading contenders show which law schools each candidate attended: Samuel Alito Yale Information on additional candidates can be found here at ConfirmThem.com: Alice Batchelder Akron University With the exception of Alito and Estrada, none of the nominees preferred by conservatives were from Ivy League law schools. Granted, universities like Texas and Virginia are much more prestigious than SMU, but conservatives would probably have taken Williams or Batchelder over Miers if given a choice. Furthermore, the oft—mentioned Alberto Gonzales is a Harvard graduate whose nomination would have met just as much opposition as Harriet Miers' has. The president's base wanted a nominee with a proven conservative record so they would 1.) know that the president was not ashamed of them and 2.) not have to worry about another Republican nominee turning into a liberal on the bench. To suggest that elitism drives the opposition to Harriet Miers is untrue and unfair. Josh Bentley 10 06 05 |
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
|