Reader response

Lee Kwiatek writes:

Ethel C. Fenig has no shame

I have stood beneath the "Arbeit macht frei" gate at Auschwitz.  I have walked past the barracks and the camp fencing.  I have been to that house of death. 

Perhaps Ethel Fenig should visit Auschwitz—Birkenau, then she might be able to truly comprehend how shamefully and inappropriately Dick Cheney was dressed for the 60th Liberation Ceremony.

Or perhaps Ethel did visit, and was like the other American visitors who visited while I was there; shouting loudly to Uncle Henry that he "must see this" and having their photos taken in front of the ovens.   

Perhaps Ethel Fenig does not grasp the meaning of symbolism.  Indeed, the Vice—President had "a sensible parka with boots."   Sensible for a day in the snow, not a day of reflection on the millions of lives lived and lost at Auschwitz; all without a sensible coat, all without sensible shoes.  It was in poor taste, Ethel.  It showed a complete lack of dignity.  It showed a complete lack of respect.    Cheney does not embody decency.  Unfortunately, with you to support him Ethel, he does embody the country he represents.   Not, as you suggest, the epitome of good taste; but the epitome of impropriety; the epitome of vulgarity. He has shamed us. 

Ethel Fenig responds:

Dear Leigh A. Kwiatek:
 
Auschwitz still evokes deep emotions——as it should.
 
We both agree it was a place where unspeakable evils were committed; a place that  should eternally be a reminder of those evils.
 
Apparently we disagree though on an extraneous matter——appropriate attire for the commemorative ceremony and its symbolism.  I felt the fashion report devoid of respect for the meaning of the event and the place; you believe the clothing is an important statement of the wearer's feelings.
 
And in a free country we can both express our  beliefs without fear of retaliation.  But we  both agree "Never again!" 
 
And that is what is important.