Liberals try to compensate for the weakness of their ideas by craftily manipulating the narrative of the debate. They are supported by liberal academicians who manipulate their research methodologies to predispose results that are amenable to their liberal sensitivities.  We should be wary because the lack of intellectual diversity undermines the quality of scholarly work, and dulls the vibrancy of thought in the public forum. Cunningly crafted studies under the guise of objective research are reviewed, then cited, by peers prudently protecting their own careers. Eventually, a bunch of concocted poppycock masquerading as authentic research pollutes the public square, where pandering politicians and liberal media patsies loiter.  They are eager to peddle leftist orthodoxy in a marketplace of counterfeit ideas.   One such patsy was a questioner at a GOP presidential debate in the last cycle who gleefully inquired about gender pay disparities.   Her...(Read Full Article)