Why Not Admit the Obvious: The President Won't Blame Them because He Agrees with Them

We all know that Barack Obama was nominally a lawyer at some point in his past – not a good one, by anyone's account, but he was one.  Assume for the moment that Barack Obama had as his client The Muslim Brotherhood, or CAIR, or Hamas, or any one of dozens of organizations dedicated to taking down the United States.  Could he possibly have done a more effective job of hiding his client's actions or intentions while they went about conducting criminal operations unmolested as he has for seven years?  Could he have been more successful at misdirecting and obfuscating and lying about their intentions and deeds than he has already been?

Though not every lawyer shares a client's philosophy, the zeal with which an attorney does his job can sometimes be proportionate to his identity with the client's goals and objectives.  The president certainly is a zealous fellow when it comes to radical Islam.

We know he won't call it "radical Islam," claiming that that is a distraction or a talking point.  Perhaps the real reason is that he doesn't believe that what the Islamists he supports are doing is radical at all.  Maybe the actual issue is that he believes in and supports their efforts to infiltrate and subvert the United States.  That would explain an awful lot, wouldn't it?

For seven years, we have heard how the president "doesn't get it" and is in over his head, is naive, and countless other excuses.  None of this has ever been the problem.  He gets it.  He simply gets it with regard to his own agenda, his own end game.

It's the American people who continue not to get it.  The president is in bed with the enemy.  It is ironic that so many of those who are angry that the president won't say "radical Islam" themselves won't openly say that he is and always has been the patron of radical Islamists, and he protects them for that reason.  Until we admit this, and see him for what he is and what he has been doing consistently and with determination, we enable him to succeed.

The president points to his limited efforts to eradicate certain violent Muslims through drone strikes and minimal military operations, as if this proves he is "one of us" and is working to protect the United States.  Muslims attack other Muslims all the time, but they are all still Muslims.  If the president chooses to assist certain factions he favors against certain others, this is hardly being done to protect the United States.  If that were his objective, he wouldn't be freeing a significant number of homicidal Muslims as well, who are back on the job killing Americans.  He is barely lifting a finger militarily or internationally, regardless of what he says.

However, he is moving heaven and earth domestically, where the actual invasion and conquest is actively going on.  People who recognize that we have seen increasing levels of terroristic violence across the country committed in the name of Islam by its perpetrators want the president to name the threat for the simple reason that his failure to do so, when viewed with all the other things he has done to protect and promote Islamists to weaken our military, our national government, and our security, tells them that he is in league with them and that he will not betray them while he repeatedly betrays us.  He refuses to identify them because he is their strongest supporter and their most steadfast protector.  His unwillingness to admit that there is any Islamic component at all to the terror, even when the terrorists say it happily, tells us that he is willfully misdirecting us from the truth, even when that ensures that more Americans will die.

Throughout this week, we have seen news reports of FBI analysts, whose work was to connect the dots, having their files erased of all Muslim suspects who were actively plotting against us.  We have heard of how the FBI's hands were tied, and the new rules required that they drop their surveillance of Muslim suspects against whom concrete evidence had not yet been found and how those suspects went on to commit mass murder, including this week in Orlando.  We have heard how employers and neighbors of Muslims who engaged in terrorism here were afraid of saying anything against the terrorists because they were Muslim, including both Orlando and San Bernardino.  Our government has vowed to punish those who express legitimate fears about Muslims behaving suspiciously, which the government deems Islamophobia rather than domestic or national security.  That is, our government has vowed to punish Americans who have the audacity to object to their own destruction.  How would any of this be different if we had an openly Muslim president and a pro-Muslim, pro-sharia government?

None of this is new, and it continues to be the policy of this administration right up to the last couple of days, when the Department of Homeland Security has come out with new prohibitions on words that might offend those who most want to destroy this country.  Words like "jihad" and "sharia" are banned by government fascists who control speech and thought.  There was a simultaneous story this week about a 25-year-old Syrian immigrant, Laila Alawa, who is one of 15  members of the Homeland Security Advisory Council Subcommittee on Countering Violent Extremism and who is rabidly anti-American and an anti-white racist.  She seems fine with Islamic violent extremism, declaring that 9/11 changed the world for good.  It is the committee on which she serves that advocated censoring those words that might offend Muslims. 

Those who work within this administration to harm the United States in the name of Islam have been serving at the president's pleasure, or with his blessing.  If that were not true, he would purge the government of all such anti-American and pro-Islamist enemies of the country.  He doesn't.  Their numbers grow steadily.  This is his administration.  These are his surrogates.  They are the vehicle by which his policies, his goals, and his beliefs are being put into effect.  He is one of them.  There is no other explanation for them populating our government at every level, but particularly the highest ones.  Those who most vehemently represent the president's views are rewarded with the opportunity to destroy this country from within, along with complete immunity from punishment or retribution for expressing their desire to do just that.

Naturally, an armed citizenry is a substantial obstacle to our overthrow.  It is for this president and his party members a rather happy coincidence, therefore, that we have just experienced both an Islamic victory on our soil, about which the president has vowed to do absolutely nothing, and the use of a gun, about which the president has vowed to do everything in his power.  It is at times like this that his priorities and goals converge and are laid open to be seen unmistakably.  Americans must pay the price for what was done to them.  It is our rights, but not those of the invaders and traitors, that must be slashed. 

It's time we admit the obvious.  Radical Islam isn't radical to this president.  It's simply a means to an end.  Our end.

We all know that Barack Obama was nominally a lawyer at some point in his past – not a good one, by anyone's account, but he was one.  Assume for the moment that Barack Obama had as his client The Muslim Brotherhood, or CAIR, or Hamas, or any one of dozens of organizations dedicated to taking down the United States.  Could he possibly have done a more effective job of hiding his client's actions or intentions while they went about conducting criminal operations unmolested as he has for seven years?  Could he have been more successful at misdirecting and obfuscating and lying about their intentions and deeds than he has already been?

Though not every lawyer shares a client's philosophy, the zeal with which an attorney does his job can sometimes be proportionate to his identity with the client's goals and objectives.  The president certainly is a zealous fellow when it comes to radical Islam.

We know he won't call it "radical Islam," claiming that that is a distraction or a talking point.  Perhaps the real reason is that he doesn't believe that what the Islamists he supports are doing is radical at all.  Maybe the actual issue is that he believes in and supports their efforts to infiltrate and subvert the United States.  That would explain an awful lot, wouldn't it?

For seven years, we have heard how the president "doesn't get it" and is in over his head, is naive, and countless other excuses.  None of this has ever been the problem.  He gets it.  He simply gets it with regard to his own agenda, his own end game.

It's the American people who continue not to get it.  The president is in bed with the enemy.  It is ironic that so many of those who are angry that the president won't say "radical Islam" themselves won't openly say that he is and always has been the patron of radical Islamists, and he protects them for that reason.  Until we admit this, and see him for what he is and what he has been doing consistently and with determination, we enable him to succeed.

The president points to his limited efforts to eradicate certain violent Muslims through drone strikes and minimal military operations, as if this proves he is "one of us" and is working to protect the United States.  Muslims attack other Muslims all the time, but they are all still Muslims.  If the president chooses to assist certain factions he favors against certain others, this is hardly being done to protect the United States.  If that were his objective, he wouldn't be freeing a significant number of homicidal Muslims as well, who are back on the job killing Americans.  He is barely lifting a finger militarily or internationally, regardless of what he says.

However, he is moving heaven and earth domestically, where the actual invasion and conquest is actively going on.  People who recognize that we have seen increasing levels of terroristic violence across the country committed in the name of Islam by its perpetrators want the president to name the threat for the simple reason that his failure to do so, when viewed with all the other things he has done to protect and promote Islamists to weaken our military, our national government, and our security, tells them that he is in league with them and that he will not betray them while he repeatedly betrays us.  He refuses to identify them because he is their strongest supporter and their most steadfast protector.  His unwillingness to admit that there is any Islamic component at all to the terror, even when the terrorists say it happily, tells us that he is willfully misdirecting us from the truth, even when that ensures that more Americans will die.

Throughout this week, we have seen news reports of FBI analysts, whose work was to connect the dots, having their files erased of all Muslim suspects who were actively plotting against us.  We have heard of how the FBI's hands were tied, and the new rules required that they drop their surveillance of Muslim suspects against whom concrete evidence had not yet been found and how those suspects went on to commit mass murder, including this week in Orlando.  We have heard how employers and neighbors of Muslims who engaged in terrorism here were afraid of saying anything against the terrorists because they were Muslim, including both Orlando and San Bernardino.  Our government has vowed to punish those who express legitimate fears about Muslims behaving suspiciously, which the government deems Islamophobia rather than domestic or national security.  That is, our government has vowed to punish Americans who have the audacity to object to their own destruction.  How would any of this be different if we had an openly Muslim president and a pro-Muslim, pro-sharia government?

None of this is new, and it continues to be the policy of this administration right up to the last couple of days, when the Department of Homeland Security has come out with new prohibitions on words that might offend those who most want to destroy this country.  Words like "jihad" and "sharia" are banned by government fascists who control speech and thought.  There was a simultaneous story this week about a 25-year-old Syrian immigrant, Laila Alawa, who is one of 15  members of the Homeland Security Advisory Council Subcommittee on Countering Violent Extremism and who is rabidly anti-American and an anti-white racist.  She seems fine with Islamic violent extremism, declaring that 9/11 changed the world for good.  It is the committee on which she serves that advocated censoring those words that might offend Muslims. 

Those who work within this administration to harm the United States in the name of Islam have been serving at the president's pleasure, or with his blessing.  If that were not true, he would purge the government of all such anti-American and pro-Islamist enemies of the country.  He doesn't.  Their numbers grow steadily.  This is his administration.  These are his surrogates.  They are the vehicle by which his policies, his goals, and his beliefs are being put into effect.  He is one of them.  There is no other explanation for them populating our government at every level, but particularly the highest ones.  Those who most vehemently represent the president's views are rewarded with the opportunity to destroy this country from within, along with complete immunity from punishment or retribution for expressing their desire to do just that.

Naturally, an armed citizenry is a substantial obstacle to our overthrow.  It is for this president and his party members a rather happy coincidence, therefore, that we have just experienced both an Islamic victory on our soil, about which the president has vowed to do absolutely nothing, and the use of a gun, about which the president has vowed to do everything in his power.  It is at times like this that his priorities and goals converge and are laid open to be seen unmistakably.  Americans must pay the price for what was done to them.  It is our rights, but not those of the invaders and traitors, that must be slashed. 

It's time we admit the obvious.  Radical Islam isn't radical to this president.  It's simply a means to an end.  Our end.