How the Left Treats Obama Like a Child

My recent post titled "America needing a white Republican president" has brought out the raving Leftist lunatics.  Despite the fact that I'm black, most Leftists are calling me a racist. What is more pathetic is they have called my friend Joe the Plumber a racist for re-posting the article.

It should come as no surprise that most of the ignoramuses who commented about the article only read the title; or had somebody read the title to them.

The gist of the article is that if America had a white Republican president, everybody would be free to criticize him without fear of being called a racist. I go on to make the point that disagreeing with a white president should have the same implications of disagreeing with Obama.

Apparently not. God forbid Obama should have to actually deal with life all by himself.

White Republican presidents needed no such protection.  Blacks disagreed with Bush and many wanted him to fail. Were they deemed racists?  Of course not.  Even for the blacks who are racists, people just chalked their criticism up to a difference in ideologies.

I made the following comment recently to a panel of distinguished Democrats at a prestigious institution:

Black Conservatives are called behind scratching, black-anglo-saxon, boot-licking, buck-dancing, butt-kissing, co-caucasian, cocktail-sipping, foot shuffling, hi yaller, handkerchief-head, opporTOMist, Oreo TM cookie, rent-a-Tom, servant-of-the-right-wing, self-hating, self-loathing, shoeshine boy, speak-when-spoken-to, Stepin Fetchit, thank-ya-boss, uppity un-cola, Uncle Tom, race traitor, Rush Limbaugh wannabes, to name a few.

I then asked, "Can you name me ONE thing that black Liberals are called by black conservatives?"

Answer by one of the panelists: "Liberal."

That's the best that fraud could do.

Meddling Liberals believe they need to protect a man who volunteered to be the Chief Executive of the United States. The people asking for answers are not some Democrat-sanctioned neo-Nazi fringe group like the KKK or the Tea Party-mimicking Coffee Party, with a membership of less than 500.

Instead the Tea Party comprises approximately 50 million+ responsible, taxpaying, patriotic America-loving law-abiding citizens. The Tea Party -- stockholders in America -- have a right to ask questions of the Chief Executive of America without being called racists.

Bob Johnson, the CEO of BET, could handle stockholder criticism without crying racism, particularly if BET were failing as miserably as the American economy. Oprah Winfrey's corporation has white stockholders. I'm sure some of them question her wisdom in leaving her daytime talk show gig and promptly losing over $100M of their money. Are they racists?

If Obama were the CEO of a private-sector company, his actions would at the very least get him drug-tested.

As a former management consultant to some of the world's largest corporations, I don't know a single former client who wouldn't have fired Obama in the second year of his tenure. In most of those organizations, Obama wouldn't have escaped one year's scrutiny, before he would have been tossed. They would have seen enough. Their stockholders would have seen enough.

The man who said he would cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term will have more than doubled the national debt before the end of his second term. The man who called a white Republican president unpatriotic to run up a debt of $9T, will have amassed a debt of $20T+ by the end of his tenure, yet there were no calls of racism when Obama said this of Bush.

Shouldn't America's black chief executive be held to the same standards as others? Or is it ok to treat Obama worse than you would treat a child?

At least children are taught lessons and consequences. Liberals won't allow Obama to learn from mistakes. In fact, they continue to encourage his mistakes, because they don't want to appear to the racists that most are. It's an elaborate system of cover-up, the irony being that the cover-up emphasizes their racism: the racism of low expectations, and their incessant need to coddle blacks...for profit.

Obama represents Frankenstein's monster of Liberalism, an experiment gone bad. The monster unfortunately has been unleashed on America.

Kevin Jackson  blogs at The Black Sphere

My recent post titled "America needing a white Republican president" has brought out the raving Leftist lunatics.  Despite the fact that I'm black, most Leftists are calling me a racist. What is more pathetic is they have called my friend Joe the Plumber a racist for re-posting the article.

It should come as no surprise that most of the ignoramuses who commented about the article only read the title; or had somebody read the title to them.

The gist of the article is that if America had a white Republican president, everybody would be free to criticize him without fear of being called a racist. I go on to make the point that disagreeing with a white president should have the same implications of disagreeing with Obama.

Apparently not. God forbid Obama should have to actually deal with life all by himself.

White Republican presidents needed no such protection.  Blacks disagreed with Bush and many wanted him to fail. Were they deemed racists?  Of course not.  Even for the blacks who are racists, people just chalked their criticism up to a difference in ideologies.

I made the following comment recently to a panel of distinguished Democrats at a prestigious institution:

Black Conservatives are called behind scratching, black-anglo-saxon, boot-licking, buck-dancing, butt-kissing, co-caucasian, cocktail-sipping, foot shuffling, hi yaller, handkerchief-head, opporTOMist, Oreo TM cookie, rent-a-Tom, servant-of-the-right-wing, self-hating, self-loathing, shoeshine boy, speak-when-spoken-to, Stepin Fetchit, thank-ya-boss, uppity un-cola, Uncle Tom, race traitor, Rush Limbaugh wannabes, to name a few.

I then asked, "Can you name me ONE thing that black Liberals are called by black conservatives?"

Answer by one of the panelists: "Liberal."

That's the best that fraud could do.

Meddling Liberals believe they need to protect a man who volunteered to be the Chief Executive of the United States. The people asking for answers are not some Democrat-sanctioned neo-Nazi fringe group like the KKK or the Tea Party-mimicking Coffee Party, with a membership of less than 500.

Instead the Tea Party comprises approximately 50 million+ responsible, taxpaying, patriotic America-loving law-abiding citizens. The Tea Party -- stockholders in America -- have a right to ask questions of the Chief Executive of America without being called racists.

Bob Johnson, the CEO of BET, could handle stockholder criticism without crying racism, particularly if BET were failing as miserably as the American economy. Oprah Winfrey's corporation has white stockholders. I'm sure some of them question her wisdom in leaving her daytime talk show gig and promptly losing over $100M of their money. Are they racists?

If Obama were the CEO of a private-sector company, his actions would at the very least get him drug-tested.

As a former management consultant to some of the world's largest corporations, I don't know a single former client who wouldn't have fired Obama in the second year of his tenure. In most of those organizations, Obama wouldn't have escaped one year's scrutiny, before he would have been tossed. They would have seen enough. Their stockholders would have seen enough.

The man who said he would cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term will have more than doubled the national debt before the end of his second term. The man who called a white Republican president unpatriotic to run up a debt of $9T, will have amassed a debt of $20T+ by the end of his tenure, yet there were no calls of racism when Obama said this of Bush.

Shouldn't America's black chief executive be held to the same standards as others? Or is it ok to treat Obama worse than you would treat a child?

At least children are taught lessons and consequences. Liberals won't allow Obama to learn from mistakes. In fact, they continue to encourage his mistakes, because they don't want to appear to the racists that most are. It's an elaborate system of cover-up, the irony being that the cover-up emphasizes their racism: the racism of low expectations, and their incessant need to coddle blacks...for profit.

Obama represents Frankenstein's monster of Liberalism, an experiment gone bad. The monster unfortunately has been unleashed on America.

Kevin Jackson  blogs at The Black Sphere

RECENT VIDEOS