The Book of Obama: The Ganza Megillah

The story of Purim is found in the Book of Esther, a long, detailed story known as the "Megillah."  In Yiddish, the term "Ganza Megillah" has a number of meanings -- usually a long story -- which is how I am using it now. This week was Purim, the start of the post-mortem releases of the Breitbart tapes on Obama. This is the beginning of the Breitbart effort to force  the  first open media focus on the racism at the heart of so called Critical Race Studies and an honest examination of who Obama really is.

I think all  three -- Purim, Breitbart and Obama -- are related in this Megillah.

Purim

Let's start with Purim and the remarkable account of the holiday  by blogger Sultan Knish.

It is the story of how Queen Esther at the urging of her uncle saved her  people from the slaughter urged upon the king by an evil  vizier, but it is much more. In Sultan Knish's telling -- far more accurate a telling than one finds in most synagogues in America today or the Huffington Post  or wherever New Agers congregate -- it is a violent story about  strategic preemptive strikes for survival and is a poor fit for liberal pieties. It's about a God "less concerned about feelings and tolerance than with justice and truth." It's about skin of the teeth survival, and in the end an event well worth celebrating:

[The Grand Vizier] casts a lot, [to decide when the slaughter shall begin] random chance in a random world where chance is supreme and the whim of every ruler outweighs the weight of history. The bills are signed, the laws are passed, the decrees go out, the officers from the vast imperial bureaucracy are assigned to inform every citizen that their new age will be inaugurated with blood. A people who are not a proper part of the multicultural empire of laws must be wiped out in a properly democratic fashion. Crowd-sourced genocide.

And then the Grand Vizier ends up dangling from a rope, the tanks break through to Berlin, the chariots fall into the sea, the mustachioed dictator dies in a bedroom in Moscow his clothes soaked in his own urine -- and everything has gone completely wrong.

It's an old story and a new story. We tell it over and over again because it is always happening. It is our story and the story of the world. It is the story we have accepted from our parents and it is the story that we will pass on to our children. It is the story of the blood sacrifice of the New Age that goes wrong. The sacrifice survives, bloodied and scarred, the New Age goes down to ruin.

Once again we are the sacrifice to be slaughtered on the altar of the Arab Spring, of peace with the Muslim world, of a global age of global government for which only a few million people need to die. The knife is sharpened, the Grand Vizier and his aides smile, and the time is almost here. But it is not here yet. Now we sit down to hear the Megillah and remember how the story always ends.

Breitbart's Obama Tapes

The tapes of Obama supporting and embracing Derrick Bell at Harvard released by Breitbart's staff after his untimely death,  which were covered up by Obama's friend Harvard Professor Charles Ogletree, the media and undoubtedly others, establish that the pre-election image of Obama as a post racial uniter was as accurate a description of the true Obama as the notion of the Grand Vizier as an enforcer of a Persian multi-cult paradise might be. In fact Derrick Bell was a barely disguised racist, an anti-Semite  and an inspiration for Obama's racist and anti -Semitic  pastor of 20 years, Jeremiah Wright.

He was the creator of a school of thought known in  academic speak as "critical race theory," a pernicious  flimsy cover for anti-Semitic, anti-white, anti-Asian  thought which contends that there is no real "merit."  Merit in the eyes of Bell and his followers is just a cover, a social construct that maintains the power of dominant groups.  If people achieve more it is not because they worked harder or entered life with more natural ability; it is, in this upside down destructive world proof that they obtained what they did unfairly.   From this it would logically follow that the goods of the world ought to be stripped from them and given to others, that things like admission to prestigious positions and universities ought to be done on a racial basis instead of on demonstrated merit, that the truth of things is less important than the cause they advance.  That there is no justice and free speech and debate must be stifled.

Some years ago two scholars got to the heart of the matter wading through the academic doublespeak:

"Would you want to be operated on by a surgeon trained at a medical school that did not evaluate its students? Would you want to fly in a plane designed by people convinced that the laws of physics are socially constructed? Would you want to be tried by a legal system indifferent to the distinction between fact and fiction? These questions may seem absurd, but these are theories being seriously advanced by radical multiculturalists that force us to ask them. These scholars assert that such concepts as truth and merit are inextricably racist and sexist, that reason and objectivity are merely sophisticated masks for ideological bias, and that reality itself is nothing more than a socially constructed mechanism for preserving the power of the ruling elite.

In Beyond All Reason, liberal legal scholars Daniel A. Farber and Suzanna Sherry mount the first systematic critique of radical multiculturalism as a form of legal scholarship. Beginning with an incisive overview of the origins and basic tenets of radical multiculturalism, the authors critically examine the work of Derrick Bell, Catherine MacKinnon, Patricia Williams, and Richard Delgado, and explore the alarming implications of their theories. Farber and Sherry push these theories to their logical conclusions and show that radical multiculturalism is destructive of the very goals it wishes to affirm. If, for example, the concept of advancement based on merit is fraudulent, as the multiculturalists claim, the disproportionate success of Jews and Asians in our culture becomes difficult to explain without opening the door to age-old anti-Semitic and racist stereotypes. If historical and scientific truths are entirely relative social constructs, then Holocaust denial becomes merely a matter of perspective, and Creationism has as much "validity" as evolution. The authors go on to show that rather than promoting more dialogue, the radical multiculturalist preferences for legal storytelling and identity politics over reasoned argument produces an insular set of positions that resist open debate. Indeed, radical multiculturalists cannot critically examine each others' ideas without incurring vehement accusations of racism and sexism, much less engage in fruitful discussion with a mainstream that does not share their assumptions. Here again, Farber and Sherry show that the end result of such thinking is not freedom but a kind of totalitarianism where dissent cannot be tolerated and only the naked will to power remains to settle differences.

Sharply written and brilliantly argued, this book is itself a model of the kind of clarity, civility, and dispassionate critical thinking which the authors seek to preserve from the attacks of the radical multiculturalists. With far-reaching implications for such issues as government control of hate speech and pornography, affirmative action, legal reform, and the fate of all minorities, Beyond All Reason is a provocative contribution to one of the most important controversies of our time."

These two thoughtful scholars were not the only ones to raise alarm about this pernicious doctrine Bell advanced.  Thomas Sowell spotted it for what it was at the time of the sit ins at Harvard where Bell harangues that "white boys got tenure" as he pushed for the hiring of an unqualified black woman. Sowell speaks with Brian Lamb on C-SPAN

SOWELL:. Again, notice, that once, once you let in the students who cannot make, meet the academic standards, you're going to end up having to let in professors who can't meet the academic standards. You're going to have to create courses that don't meet the academic standards.

LAMB: Correct me on the, on the names and everything. Derrick Bell?

SOWELL: Yes.

LAMB: Harvard Law School, black man.

SOWELL: Yes.

LAMB: Threatened the law school if they didn't hire a black woman, he's going, he's leaving?

SOWELL: Well, if I understand it correctly, he's taking unpaid leave until such time as they hire a woman of color, as he says. Well, he's also said that by black, he does not mean skin color, he means those who are really black, not those who think white and look black. And so what he is really saying is he wants ideological conformity in the people that are hired to fill this position. That's not uncommon either. I know a black woman, for example, who had a Ph.D. -- she's had a book published, she has another contract on another book, she's taught at a couple of very nice places, she has a devil of a time getting a job -- not a job in a prestigious institution, a job teaching at a college. And the reason is that she gets shot down, blackballed, whatever, by people who don't like her ideology. That's happening not only racially, it's also happening where race is not an issue. In a law school, I learned recently, there's a woman who was being considered for a tenured position, and all the men voted for her and all the woman voted against her, because she does not follow radical feminism, and so you're getting these ideological tests, so that at the very time that there's all this mouthing of the word diversity, there is this extremely narrow ideological conformity that is being enforced wherever people have the power to enforce it.

LAMB: What did you think of Derrick Bell's whole plan?

SOWELL: Well, his chances of success will depend on whether or not he has overestimated his importance to the Harvard Law School. I think it would be a tragedy if they caved in, and I was very pleased to see that they seemed to show some backbone, which is quite rare among academics.

LAMB: Now, what do you think of the press treatment of him?

SOWELL: It's been quite gentle.

LAMB: You mean, is he a hero?

SOWELL: To me?

LAMB: No. Basically, I mean, from the press coverage, you've seen, is he a hero to the ...?

SOWELL: Well, he's looked at as an idealist who is self-sacrificing and so on. I suppose one could, if one wanted to look at it that way, have seen Hitler that way in his early days. It's just a question of where that kind of idealism leads. He has launched a despicable attack on a young black professor at the law school who doesn't go along with this. A young man named Randall Kennedy, who has written a very thoughtful, intelligent article last June in the Harvard Law Review, questioning some of the assumptions that people are making, people like Derrick Bell and doing it in a very gentlemanly as well as very logical way, empirical way, and that's not what they want. They want the conclusion to be that -- they want him to march in lock step and he won't do it, and they're doing their best to make life impossible for him.[snip] I was very pleased to see that Alan Dershowitz of Harvard had criticized this and that he picked up the fact that what Bell is really asking for is not only that people be hired by race, but that they be hired to fit Derek Bell's ideology.

I imagine those who cannot defend Bell when put on the spot about what Critical Race Theory really stands for, like Soledad O'Brien, will fall back on the position that Obama was young and we are all rather feckless in our youth.

Breitbart reminds us that when Obama taught at the University of Chicago Law School he made his students read Bell's "most radical and inflammatory writings" including a book which Bell himself described as reflecting his experience  as follows: 

Black people will never gain full equality in this country. Even those Herculean efforts we hail as successful will produce no more than temporary peaks of progress, short-lived victories that slide into irrelevance as racial patterns adapt in ways that maintain white dominance. This is a hard-to-accept fact that all history verifies. We must acknowledge it, not as a sign of submission, but as an act of ultimate defiance. (p. 12, italics in original) [/quote]

Bell did not confine himself to "scholarly works."  He also wrote a SciFi novel called "The Space Traders," a crackpot, Farrakhan type  work in which aliens negotiate with white Republican office holders to take all the blacks to use as their slaves and Jews who try to help them only  do so to keep from being targeted themselves. calling Anne Frank  "the symbol of Jewish hypocrisy."

Bell justified black anti-Jewish sentiment as backlash for "Jewish neoconservative racism. John Podhoretz writes in Commentary:

Bell denounced Henry Louis (Skip) Gates for writing a New York Times op-ed condemning black anti-Semitism:

I was furious. Even if everything he said was true, it was inexcusable not to mention what might have motivated blacks to feel this way, and to fail to talk about all the Jewish neoconservative racists who are undermining blacks in every way they can

It might seem nice of Bell to acknowledge the awfulness of anti-Semitism, but he didn't mean it. The very same interview began as follows: "We should really appreciate the Louis Farrakhans and the Khalid Muhammads while we've got them."  

Indeed, Obama's fervid support of Bell  and his poisonous notions that people of wealth and achievement  did it at your expense is  of a piece with his longtime association with  anti-Semites  and his belief in a world of white privilege and anti-black discrimination might as well explain why he called  Ms. Fluke to offer sympathy and has kept still about the racialist burning of a Kansas City white schoolchild after apparent provocation by black teachers  themselves undoubtedly sold on and propagating Bell's divisive nonsense.

If you believe in merit, truth , justice  and a post racial America you must do everything you can to defeat Obama this year. If you voted for him in 2008, recognize that you were duped by a bunch of fast talking political manipulators, academics and media enablers.  If you don't believe merit, truth, equality of treatment under the law and justice are anything but social constructs to keep the dominant class in power, be ready for more skin- of- your- teeth Purim- like survival tests.

The story of Purim is found in the Book of Esther, a long, detailed story known as the "Megillah."  In Yiddish, the term "Ganza Megillah" has a number of meanings -- usually a long story -- which is how I am using it now. This week was Purim, the start of the post-mortem releases of the Breitbart tapes on Obama. This is the beginning of the Breitbart effort to force  the  first open media focus on the racism at the heart of so called Critical Race Studies and an honest examination of who Obama really is.

I think all  three -- Purim, Breitbart and Obama -- are related in this Megillah.

Purim

Let's start with Purim and the remarkable account of the holiday  by blogger Sultan Knish.

It is the story of how Queen Esther at the urging of her uncle saved her  people from the slaughter urged upon the king by an evil  vizier, but it is much more. In Sultan Knish's telling -- far more accurate a telling than one finds in most synagogues in America today or the Huffington Post  or wherever New Agers congregate -- it is a violent story about  strategic preemptive strikes for survival and is a poor fit for liberal pieties. It's about a God "less concerned about feelings and tolerance than with justice and truth." It's about skin of the teeth survival, and in the end an event well worth celebrating:

[The Grand Vizier] casts a lot, [to decide when the slaughter shall begin] random chance in a random world where chance is supreme and the whim of every ruler outweighs the weight of history. The bills are signed, the laws are passed, the decrees go out, the officers from the vast imperial bureaucracy are assigned to inform every citizen that their new age will be inaugurated with blood. A people who are not a proper part of the multicultural empire of laws must be wiped out in a properly democratic fashion. Crowd-sourced genocide.

And then the Grand Vizier ends up dangling from a rope, the tanks break through to Berlin, the chariots fall into the sea, the mustachioed dictator dies in a bedroom in Moscow his clothes soaked in his own urine -- and everything has gone completely wrong.

It's an old story and a new story. We tell it over and over again because it is always happening. It is our story and the story of the world. It is the story we have accepted from our parents and it is the story that we will pass on to our children. It is the story of the blood sacrifice of the New Age that goes wrong. The sacrifice survives, bloodied and scarred, the New Age goes down to ruin.

Once again we are the sacrifice to be slaughtered on the altar of the Arab Spring, of peace with the Muslim world, of a global age of global government for which only a few million people need to die. The knife is sharpened, the Grand Vizier and his aides smile, and the time is almost here. But it is not here yet. Now we sit down to hear the Megillah and remember how the story always ends.

Breitbart's Obama Tapes

The tapes of Obama supporting and embracing Derrick Bell at Harvard released by Breitbart's staff after his untimely death,  which were covered up by Obama's friend Harvard Professor Charles Ogletree, the media and undoubtedly others, establish that the pre-election image of Obama as a post racial uniter was as accurate a description of the true Obama as the notion of the Grand Vizier as an enforcer of a Persian multi-cult paradise might be. In fact Derrick Bell was a barely disguised racist, an anti-Semite  and an inspiration for Obama's racist and anti -Semitic  pastor of 20 years, Jeremiah Wright.

He was the creator of a school of thought known in  academic speak as "critical race theory," a pernicious  flimsy cover for anti-Semitic, anti-white, anti-Asian  thought which contends that there is no real "merit."  Merit in the eyes of Bell and his followers is just a cover, a social construct that maintains the power of dominant groups.  If people achieve more it is not because they worked harder or entered life with more natural ability; it is, in this upside down destructive world proof that they obtained what they did unfairly.   From this it would logically follow that the goods of the world ought to be stripped from them and given to others, that things like admission to prestigious positions and universities ought to be done on a racial basis instead of on demonstrated merit, that the truth of things is less important than the cause they advance.  That there is no justice and free speech and debate must be stifled.

Some years ago two scholars got to the heart of the matter wading through the academic doublespeak:

"Would you want to be operated on by a surgeon trained at a medical school that did not evaluate its students? Would you want to fly in a plane designed by people convinced that the laws of physics are socially constructed? Would you want to be tried by a legal system indifferent to the distinction between fact and fiction? These questions may seem absurd, but these are theories being seriously advanced by radical multiculturalists that force us to ask them. These scholars assert that such concepts as truth and merit are inextricably racist and sexist, that reason and objectivity are merely sophisticated masks for ideological bias, and that reality itself is nothing more than a socially constructed mechanism for preserving the power of the ruling elite.

In Beyond All Reason, liberal legal scholars Daniel A. Farber and Suzanna Sherry mount the first systematic critique of radical multiculturalism as a form of legal scholarship. Beginning with an incisive overview of the origins and basic tenets of radical multiculturalism, the authors critically examine the work of Derrick Bell, Catherine MacKinnon, Patricia Williams, and Richard Delgado, and explore the alarming implications of their theories. Farber and Sherry push these theories to their logical conclusions and show that radical multiculturalism is destructive of the very goals it wishes to affirm. If, for example, the concept of advancement based on merit is fraudulent, as the multiculturalists claim, the disproportionate success of Jews and Asians in our culture becomes difficult to explain without opening the door to age-old anti-Semitic and racist stereotypes. If historical and scientific truths are entirely relative social constructs, then Holocaust denial becomes merely a matter of perspective, and Creationism has as much "validity" as evolution. The authors go on to show that rather than promoting more dialogue, the radical multiculturalist preferences for legal storytelling and identity politics over reasoned argument produces an insular set of positions that resist open debate. Indeed, radical multiculturalists cannot critically examine each others' ideas without incurring vehement accusations of racism and sexism, much less engage in fruitful discussion with a mainstream that does not share their assumptions. Here again, Farber and Sherry show that the end result of such thinking is not freedom but a kind of totalitarianism where dissent cannot be tolerated and only the naked will to power remains to settle differences.

Sharply written and brilliantly argued, this book is itself a model of the kind of clarity, civility, and dispassionate critical thinking which the authors seek to preserve from the attacks of the radical multiculturalists. With far-reaching implications for such issues as government control of hate speech and pornography, affirmative action, legal reform, and the fate of all minorities, Beyond All Reason is a provocative contribution to one of the most important controversies of our time."

These two thoughtful scholars were not the only ones to raise alarm about this pernicious doctrine Bell advanced.  Thomas Sowell spotted it for what it was at the time of the sit ins at Harvard where Bell harangues that "white boys got tenure" as he pushed for the hiring of an unqualified black woman. Sowell speaks with Brian Lamb on C-SPAN

SOWELL:. Again, notice, that once, once you let in the students who cannot make, meet the academic standards, you're going to end up having to let in professors who can't meet the academic standards. You're going to have to create courses that don't meet the academic standards.

LAMB: Correct me on the, on the names and everything. Derrick Bell?

SOWELL: Yes.

LAMB: Harvard Law School, black man.

SOWELL: Yes.

LAMB: Threatened the law school if they didn't hire a black woman, he's going, he's leaving?

SOWELL: Well, if I understand it correctly, he's taking unpaid leave until such time as they hire a woman of color, as he says. Well, he's also said that by black, he does not mean skin color, he means those who are really black, not those who think white and look black. And so what he is really saying is he wants ideological conformity in the people that are hired to fill this position. That's not uncommon either. I know a black woman, for example, who had a Ph.D. -- she's had a book published, she has another contract on another book, she's taught at a couple of very nice places, she has a devil of a time getting a job -- not a job in a prestigious institution, a job teaching at a college. And the reason is that she gets shot down, blackballed, whatever, by people who don't like her ideology. That's happening not only racially, it's also happening where race is not an issue. In a law school, I learned recently, there's a woman who was being considered for a tenured position, and all the men voted for her and all the woman voted against her, because she does not follow radical feminism, and so you're getting these ideological tests, so that at the very time that there's all this mouthing of the word diversity, there is this extremely narrow ideological conformity that is being enforced wherever people have the power to enforce it.

LAMB: What did you think of Derrick Bell's whole plan?

SOWELL: Well, his chances of success will depend on whether or not he has overestimated his importance to the Harvard Law School. I think it would be a tragedy if they caved in, and I was very pleased to see that they seemed to show some backbone, which is quite rare among academics.

LAMB: Now, what do you think of the press treatment of him?

SOWELL: It's been quite gentle.

LAMB: You mean, is he a hero?

SOWELL: To me?

LAMB: No. Basically, I mean, from the press coverage, you've seen, is he a hero to the ...?

SOWELL: Well, he's looked at as an idealist who is self-sacrificing and so on. I suppose one could, if one wanted to look at it that way, have seen Hitler that way in his early days. It's just a question of where that kind of idealism leads. He has launched a despicable attack on a young black professor at the law school who doesn't go along with this. A young man named Randall Kennedy, who has written a very thoughtful, intelligent article last June in the Harvard Law Review, questioning some of the assumptions that people are making, people like Derrick Bell and doing it in a very gentlemanly as well as very logical way, empirical way, and that's not what they want. They want the conclusion to be that -- they want him to march in lock step and he won't do it, and they're doing their best to make life impossible for him.[snip] I was very pleased to see that Alan Dershowitz of Harvard had criticized this and that he picked up the fact that what Bell is really asking for is not only that people be hired by race, but that they be hired to fit Derek Bell's ideology.

I imagine those who cannot defend Bell when put on the spot about what Critical Race Theory really stands for, like Soledad O'Brien, will fall back on the position that Obama was young and we are all rather feckless in our youth.

Breitbart reminds us that when Obama taught at the University of Chicago Law School he made his students read Bell's "most radical and inflammatory writings" including a book which Bell himself described as reflecting his experience  as follows: 

Black people will never gain full equality in this country. Even those Herculean efforts we hail as successful will produce no more than temporary peaks of progress, short-lived victories that slide into irrelevance as racial patterns adapt in ways that maintain white dominance. This is a hard-to-accept fact that all history verifies. We must acknowledge it, not as a sign of submission, but as an act of ultimate defiance. (p. 12, italics in original) [/quote]

Bell did not confine himself to "scholarly works."  He also wrote a SciFi novel called "The Space Traders," a crackpot, Farrakhan type  work in which aliens negotiate with white Republican office holders to take all the blacks to use as their slaves and Jews who try to help them only  do so to keep from being targeted themselves. calling Anne Frank  "the symbol of Jewish hypocrisy."

Bell justified black anti-Jewish sentiment as backlash for "Jewish neoconservative racism. John Podhoretz writes in Commentary:

Bell denounced Henry Louis (Skip) Gates for writing a New York Times op-ed condemning black anti-Semitism:

I was furious. Even if everything he said was true, it was inexcusable not to mention what might have motivated blacks to feel this way, and to fail to talk about all the Jewish neoconservative racists who are undermining blacks in every way they can

It might seem nice of Bell to acknowledge the awfulness of anti-Semitism, but he didn't mean it. The very same interview began as follows: "We should really appreciate the Louis Farrakhans and the Khalid Muhammads while we've got them."  

Indeed, Obama's fervid support of Bell  and his poisonous notions that people of wealth and achievement  did it at your expense is  of a piece with his longtime association with  anti-Semites  and his belief in a world of white privilege and anti-black discrimination might as well explain why he called  Ms. Fluke to offer sympathy and has kept still about the racialist burning of a Kansas City white schoolchild after apparent provocation by black teachers  themselves undoubtedly sold on and propagating Bell's divisive nonsense.

If you believe in merit, truth , justice  and a post racial America you must do everything you can to defeat Obama this year. If you voted for him in 2008, recognize that you were duped by a bunch of fast talking political manipulators, academics and media enablers.  If you don't believe merit, truth, equality of treatment under the law and justice are anything but social constructs to keep the dominant class in power, be ready for more skin- of- your- teeth Purim- like survival tests.

RECENT VIDEOS