The Case against Presidential Primaries

By Robert Weissberg

Elections are sometimes called celebrations of democracy, but the 2012 election, especially for many Republicans, is hardly a joyous occasion. Three things in particular seem disturbing. First, the campaign seems far, far too long. It began over a year before the actual voting, and fatigue has already set in. Second, the contest has become hugely expensive, costing tens of millions even before the two-candidate race begins. Lastly, and particularly for Republicans (and perhaps many independents), the current candidate menu is not especially appetizing. Sort of like a vegan being stuck in a steak house searching for something minimally edible. Dissatisfaction is not limited to the GOP this year. Even some Democrats are beginning to question the Obama/Clinton choice in 2008. Why the unhappiness, and, more importantly, can it be avoided in 2016? The explanation of the malaise is simple: the current presidential primary system. Abolish multiple primaries, and the campaign will be brief (three to four months, not a year-plus), costs will drop dramatically, and the menu will improve,.... (Read Full Article)