Is the POTUS Stirring Up a Revolution?

Obama was hailed as a healing president, promising peace and harmony.  What we have seen, however, is a president distinctively divisive on racial issues, and instigating class warfare.  His actions are a prescription for a violent revolution.

During his campaign Obama gave the highly acclaimed speech on race (excerpt):

"Throughout the first year of this campaign, against all predictions to the contrary, we saw how hungry the American people were for this message of unity. Despite the temptation to view my candidacy through a purely racial lens, we won commanding victories in states with some of the whitest populations in the country. In South Carolina, where the Confederate Flag still flies, we built a powerful coalition of African Americans and white Americans."

My, how things have changed; and it didn't take long.  Shortly after Obama took office there was Obama's reaction to the incident involving Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. and the Cambridge Police Department: "President Obama said that police in Cambridge, Massachusetts, 'acted stupidly' in arresting a prominent black Harvard professor last week after a confrontation at the man's home."  He never should have stuck his nose into this.  And if he were going to say something, he should have understood the situation prior to butting in.  Instead, he routinely took the professor's side, showing his real and sincere bias, and managing to anger folks on both sides of the debate.

More recently the POTUS told a group of Hispanics, "And if Latinos sit out the election instead of saying, we're gonna punish our enemies and we're gonna reward our friends..."  Punish? Enemies?  Not exactly harmonious, peace-inspiring words.

Then in his speech before the Congressional Black Caucus he said, "I expect all of you to march with me and press on. Take off your bedroom slippers, put on your marching shoes."

And let's not forget the work of Eric Holder when his Justice Department went easy in a Philadelphia voting rights case against members of the New Black Panther Party because they are African American.

This is our post-racial president.

And then there's the class warfare. 

In 2008, then-candidate Obama's remarks in his interview with Charles Gibson should have been a clue.  When Gibson pointed out that recently when tax rates were increased government revenues decreased and when tax rates decreased revenues increased, Obama replied "Well, Charlie, what I've said is that I would look at raising the capital gains tax for purposes of fairness."  He has accusingly said ad nauseam that wealthy Americans should pay their "fair share," which means that no matter how much they are paying, they should pay more.

Mr. Obama's repetitive attacks on the wealthy have led to growing divisions between them and the less fortunate, such as the current Occupy Wall Street protestors who "want to see the rich pay a fair share of their profits in wages, wealth and income in taxes..."  When asked about the protestors, Obama replied: ""I think it expresses the frustrations that the American people feel." 

Usage of words such as greed, selfish, and mean, while always a part of the liberal description of Republicans, has escalated more in recent years.

While most pundits seem to think of this as just another chapter in American politics, albeit somewhat intense, I'm less blasé about it.  I see this as a potential beginning of serious violence in our streets and neighborhoods.  At worst, problems could escalate to a point requiring national action -- possibly a declaration of a state of emergency with military involvement.  Is it possible we could have martial law imposed on us around next November, and, coincidentally, have the elections postponed?  Not likely, but possible.

More certain, however, is the extended racial and class tension that will exist for decades.  While I never expected racism to go away completely, racial harmony in this country has been gaining momentum and is, essentially, more of a problem to the left-wing media and certain race-baiting politicos than to folks on the ground.  I'm afraid the actions of this administration may reverse the positive course that people of all races have worked so hard to establish.  Barack Obama has done his best to delay racial harmony.

And class warfare?  The vociferous screams from the left have prompted normally silent, tax-paying Americans to denigrate those who don't pay taxes: adding their voices to the argument and elevating hostilities.

I don't generally subscribe to conspiracy theories, and I'm not postulating such right now.  However, you have to wonder, given Rahm Emanuel's remarks at the beginning of Obama's administration: "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before."  Do what? Fully implement socialism?  Create a fascist-left country?  Simply elevate the problems with our economy and instigate tension between the people, and you have the perfect storm for such a scenario.  Even if this isn't being done by design, it could happen anyway.

This is one reason why so many on the right believe it is absolutely critical that we remove Mr. Obama from office in 2012.   A GOP president will certainly stir up anxiety on the left, and the cries of foul play that existed during George Bush's administration will resume.

Certainly a Republican will not be able to do much to mend recent wounds.  But the GOP is never as hostile in its criticism of the left, and the dissention will slow down and possibly stop.  Maybe after a few years and if the economy improves progress in this area will again move forward.

And yes, while there are not many high-profile, moderate Dems, a more moderate and sensible Democrat could lessen the problem as well.  However, it is highly unlikely that any Democrat (even Hillary) will challenge Obama for the Democratic nomination.  And if one did, of course, additional hostilities would generate from that.

Thanks to Barack Obama (with help from the media and left-wing pundits) hostility in America is a high as I can recall, and close to a breaking point.  With regard to this situation, the 2012 election represent a break even or lose situation.  If Obama wins, we lose.  If any Republican wins, we break even.

Obama was hailed as a healing president, promising peace and harmony.  What we have seen, however, is a president distinctively divisive on racial issues, and instigating class warfare.  His actions are a prescription for a violent revolution.

During his campaign Obama gave the highly acclaimed speech on race (excerpt):

"Throughout the first year of this campaign, against all predictions to the contrary, we saw how hungry the American people were for this message of unity. Despite the temptation to view my candidacy through a purely racial lens, we won commanding victories in states with some of the whitest populations in the country. In South Carolina, where the Confederate Flag still flies, we built a powerful coalition of African Americans and white Americans."

My, how things have changed; and it didn't take long.  Shortly after Obama took office there was Obama's reaction to the incident involving Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. and the Cambridge Police Department: "President Obama said that police in Cambridge, Massachusetts, 'acted stupidly' in arresting a prominent black Harvard professor last week after a confrontation at the man's home."  He never should have stuck his nose into this.  And if he were going to say something, he should have understood the situation prior to butting in.  Instead, he routinely took the professor's side, showing his real and sincere bias, and managing to anger folks on both sides of the debate.

More recently the POTUS told a group of Hispanics, "And if Latinos sit out the election instead of saying, we're gonna punish our enemies and we're gonna reward our friends..."  Punish? Enemies?  Not exactly harmonious, peace-inspiring words.

Then in his speech before the Congressional Black Caucus he said, "I expect all of you to march with me and press on. Take off your bedroom slippers, put on your marching shoes."

And let's not forget the work of Eric Holder when his Justice Department went easy in a Philadelphia voting rights case against members of the New Black Panther Party because they are African American.

This is our post-racial president.

And then there's the class warfare. 

In 2008, then-candidate Obama's remarks in his interview with Charles Gibson should have been a clue.  When Gibson pointed out that recently when tax rates were increased government revenues decreased and when tax rates decreased revenues increased, Obama replied "Well, Charlie, what I've said is that I would look at raising the capital gains tax for purposes of fairness."  He has accusingly said ad nauseam that wealthy Americans should pay their "fair share," which means that no matter how much they are paying, they should pay more.

Mr. Obama's repetitive attacks on the wealthy have led to growing divisions between them and the less fortunate, such as the current Occupy Wall Street protestors who "want to see the rich pay a fair share of their profits in wages, wealth and income in taxes..."  When asked about the protestors, Obama replied: ""I think it expresses the frustrations that the American people feel." 

Usage of words such as greed, selfish, and mean, while always a part of the liberal description of Republicans, has escalated more in recent years.

While most pundits seem to think of this as just another chapter in American politics, albeit somewhat intense, I'm less blasé about it.  I see this as a potential beginning of serious violence in our streets and neighborhoods.  At worst, problems could escalate to a point requiring national action -- possibly a declaration of a state of emergency with military involvement.  Is it possible we could have martial law imposed on us around next November, and, coincidentally, have the elections postponed?  Not likely, but possible.

More certain, however, is the extended racial and class tension that will exist for decades.  While I never expected racism to go away completely, racial harmony in this country has been gaining momentum and is, essentially, more of a problem to the left-wing media and certain race-baiting politicos than to folks on the ground.  I'm afraid the actions of this administration may reverse the positive course that people of all races have worked so hard to establish.  Barack Obama has done his best to delay racial harmony.

And class warfare?  The vociferous screams from the left have prompted normally silent, tax-paying Americans to denigrate those who don't pay taxes: adding their voices to the argument and elevating hostilities.

I don't generally subscribe to conspiracy theories, and I'm not postulating such right now.  However, you have to wonder, given Rahm Emanuel's remarks at the beginning of Obama's administration: "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before."  Do what? Fully implement socialism?  Create a fascist-left country?  Simply elevate the problems with our economy and instigate tension between the people, and you have the perfect storm for such a scenario.  Even if this isn't being done by design, it could happen anyway.

This is one reason why so many on the right believe it is absolutely critical that we remove Mr. Obama from office in 2012.   A GOP president will certainly stir up anxiety on the left, and the cries of foul play that existed during George Bush's administration will resume.

Certainly a Republican will not be able to do much to mend recent wounds.  But the GOP is never as hostile in its criticism of the left, and the dissention will slow down and possibly stop.  Maybe after a few years and if the economy improves progress in this area will again move forward.

And yes, while there are not many high-profile, moderate Dems, a more moderate and sensible Democrat could lessen the problem as well.  However, it is highly unlikely that any Democrat (even Hillary) will challenge Obama for the Democratic nomination.  And if one did, of course, additional hostilities would generate from that.

Thanks to Barack Obama (with help from the media and left-wing pundits) hostility in America is a high as I can recall, and close to a breaking point.  With regard to this situation, the 2012 election represent a break even or lose situation.  If Obama wins, we lose.  If any Republican wins, we break even.