Off-the-Books America

We are becoming two Americas -- not the familiar complaint about the rich and the poor, but rather the regulated and the off-the-books Americas.

Last week, Victor Davis Hanson wrote about the hollowed-out society in the Central Valley around his native Fresno, California.  He wrote:

I wanted to witness, even if superficially, what is happening to a state that has the highest sales and income taxes, the most lavish entitlements, the near-worst public schools (based on federal test scores), and the largest number of illegal aliens in the nation, along with an overregulated private sector, a stagnant and shrinking manufacturing base, and an elite environmental ethos that restricts commerce and productivity without curbing consumption.

The elementary school that he attended as a child is now 94 percent Hispanic and well below standards in English and math.  The rural roads are "fast turning into rubble."  The irrigation cutoffs have idled tens of thousands of acres, and unemployment is 15 to 20 percent. 

There are many rural "trailer-house compounds" filled with junked cars, lean-tos, and trash, but for some reason, the regulatory state does not reach out and regulate them.

It is almost as if the more California regulates, the more it does not regulate. Its public employees prefer to go after misdemeanors in the upscale areas to justify our expensive oversight industry, while ignoring the felonies in the downtrodden areas, which are becoming feral and beyond the ability of any inspector to do anything but feel irrelevant.

And, of course, nobody is doing anything about "the epidemic dumping of trash, furniture, and often toxic substances throughout California's rural hinterland."

For us middle-class drones, all this seems rather weird.  How could the government be allowing all this illegal activity?  How can our liberal ruling class, that lives to regulate everything that moves, allow this to happen?

But really, it all makes sense.  An off-the-books economy is a direct result of the centralized regulatory state.  And since the people who live and work in the off-the-books economy are often the poor and minorities, liberals just look the other way and read a page or two from Barbara Ehrenreich's Nickeled and Dimed to get themselves all riled up about Walmart.  

Suppose you are about to start on the bottom rung of the construction business, as a one-man residential fencing contractor.  If you hire American laborers, they might want to work as formal employees.  Let's just figure out what that would cost in Washington State, at the minimum wage of, say, $7.00 per hour.  There's the FICA tax of 7.65%.  There's the unemployment tax that, for a construction firm, is probably at the limit of 6 percent.  Then there is workers compensation.  That's presently at $1.30 per hour for Landscape Construction and Renovation, or 18.6 percent of the hourly wage!  All told, we are paying the government 32.2% in payroll taxes!  You think that a seat-of-the-pants start-up contractor is going to pay all that (let alone plow through the bureaucratic forms)?  No, he's going to hire illegal workers, because they want to get paid in cash.  Bank account?  Forget it: he'll cash checks at The Money Tree.

Let's look beyond the case of the gyppo contractor and the illegal alien workers.  What about the marginal unskilled kid from the inner city or the white working class?  Is he better off with his employer paying FICA, unemployment, and workers' compensation?  Of course not.  He'd be much better off if he got the money in cash rather than the promises of Social Security in forty years, unemployment benefits, and workers' comp, all adding up to 32 percent of his wages that he never sees.

When ObamaCare gets going, of course, this situation will only get worse.

Every time the government enacts a new benefit or tax or economic regulation, it increases the cost of doing business for ordinary, law-abiding businesses.  Every marginal business affected by the new tax or regulation has to make a decision: does it try to obey the law, or does it go "off the books"?  Of course, our liberal rulers understand the problem.  That is why they often exempt small businesses from the latest regulation.  But what they are admitting, every time they do it, is that their high-tax social-benefit state is profoundly unjust.

One of these days, some right-wing demagogue is going to turn the general disgust with liberal injustice into a national political movement of bitter clingers. 

But don't expect the ruling class to notice until it is too late.  As Deirdre McCloskey writes: a typical oligarchy rises, closes to new entrants, and then goes to sleep. 

Meanwhile, the regulatory state starts to break apart from its internal contradictions, and more and more of the rest of us decide to work off the books.  But there comes a time when it is not just economically necessary to avoid unjust laws and taxes.  It becomes a moral imperative.

Christopher Chantrill (mailto:chrischantrill@gmail.com) is a frequent contributor to American Thinker.  See his usgovernmentspending.com and also usgovernmentdebt.us.  At americanmanifesto.org he is blogging and writing An American Manifesto: Life After Liberalism.
We are becoming two Americas -- not the familiar complaint about the rich and the poor, but rather the regulated and the off-the-books Americas.

Last week, Victor Davis Hanson wrote about the hollowed-out society in the Central Valley around his native Fresno, California.  He wrote:

I wanted to witness, even if superficially, what is happening to a state that has the highest sales and income taxes, the most lavish entitlements, the near-worst public schools (based on federal test scores), and the largest number of illegal aliens in the nation, along with an overregulated private sector, a stagnant and shrinking manufacturing base, and an elite environmental ethos that restricts commerce and productivity without curbing consumption.

The elementary school that he attended as a child is now 94 percent Hispanic and well below standards in English and math.  The rural roads are "fast turning into rubble."  The irrigation cutoffs have idled tens of thousands of acres, and unemployment is 15 to 20 percent. 

There are many rural "trailer-house compounds" filled with junked cars, lean-tos, and trash, but for some reason, the regulatory state does not reach out and regulate them.

It is almost as if the more California regulates, the more it does not regulate. Its public employees prefer to go after misdemeanors in the upscale areas to justify our expensive oversight industry, while ignoring the felonies in the downtrodden areas, which are becoming feral and beyond the ability of any inspector to do anything but feel irrelevant.

And, of course, nobody is doing anything about "the epidemic dumping of trash, furniture, and often toxic substances throughout California's rural hinterland."

For us middle-class drones, all this seems rather weird.  How could the government be allowing all this illegal activity?  How can our liberal ruling class, that lives to regulate everything that moves, allow this to happen?

But really, it all makes sense.  An off-the-books economy is a direct result of the centralized regulatory state.  And since the people who live and work in the off-the-books economy are often the poor and minorities, liberals just look the other way and read a page or two from Barbara Ehrenreich's Nickeled and Dimed to get themselves all riled up about Walmart.  

Suppose you are about to start on the bottom rung of the construction business, as a one-man residential fencing contractor.  If you hire American laborers, they might want to work as formal employees.  Let's just figure out what that would cost in Washington State, at the minimum wage of, say, $7.00 per hour.  There's the FICA tax of 7.65%.  There's the unemployment tax that, for a construction firm, is probably at the limit of 6 percent.  Then there is workers compensation.  That's presently at $1.30 per hour for Landscape Construction and Renovation, or 18.6 percent of the hourly wage!  All told, we are paying the government 32.2% in payroll taxes!  You think that a seat-of-the-pants start-up contractor is going to pay all that (let alone plow through the bureaucratic forms)?  No, he's going to hire illegal workers, because they want to get paid in cash.  Bank account?  Forget it: he'll cash checks at The Money Tree.

Let's look beyond the case of the gyppo contractor and the illegal alien workers.  What about the marginal unskilled kid from the inner city or the white working class?  Is he better off with his employer paying FICA, unemployment, and workers' compensation?  Of course not.  He'd be much better off if he got the money in cash rather than the promises of Social Security in forty years, unemployment benefits, and workers' comp, all adding up to 32 percent of his wages that he never sees.

When ObamaCare gets going, of course, this situation will only get worse.

Every time the government enacts a new benefit or tax or economic regulation, it increases the cost of doing business for ordinary, law-abiding businesses.  Every marginal business affected by the new tax or regulation has to make a decision: does it try to obey the law, or does it go "off the books"?  Of course, our liberal rulers understand the problem.  That is why they often exempt small businesses from the latest regulation.  But what they are admitting, every time they do it, is that their high-tax social-benefit state is profoundly unjust.

One of these days, some right-wing demagogue is going to turn the general disgust with liberal injustice into a national political movement of bitter clingers. 

But don't expect the ruling class to notice until it is too late.  As Deirdre McCloskey writes: a typical oligarchy rises, closes to new entrants, and then goes to sleep. 

Meanwhile, the regulatory state starts to break apart from its internal contradictions, and more and more of the rest of us decide to work off the books.  But there comes a time when it is not just economically necessary to avoid unjust laws and taxes.  It becomes a moral imperative.

Christopher Chantrill (mailto:chrischantrill@gmail.com) is a frequent contributor to American Thinker.  See his usgovernmentspending.com and also usgovernmentdebt.us.  At americanmanifesto.org he is blogging and writing An American Manifesto: Life After Liberalism.