|
| |||||||
|
October 5, 2009 Michelle Obama's Olympic 'Gimme' SpeechBy Joe GimenezUnder the Jeopardy category of "All-Time Most Ineffective Speeches," a question which even Wolf Blitzer might have answered correctly: "What First Lady of the United States completely failed at international persuasion?" No, Wolf, it wasn't Laura Bush. The correct answer is Michelle Obama, whose speech Friday bombed and should go down as one of the worst, most selfish and ineffective entreaties of all times. Whoever wrote the speech should be fired. America should be embarrassed that our First Lady would deliver it. First, it was a "Gimme" speech. "Gimme, gimme, gimme. I deserve it. Chicago neighborhoods deserve it," was the underlying message:
Michelle's speech shows she can only communicate in the language and intellectual vacuousness of entitlement, for victims: The games "will light up lives in neighborhoods all across America and all across the world ... [and] will show every child that regardless of wealth, or gender, or race, or physical ability, there is a sport and a place for them, too." That's victimhood's entitlement. It's all about what others can and should do for you. Demonstrate that you are a member of any group that is deemed to be downtrodden in some way according to Michelle Obama and voila, the world owes you. In this case, literally. This is intellectual vapidity, especially when considering the greatness of Chicago, and contrasted with the perspective of pride in America. Chicago is a great city with a rich history, all of which seemed to have been lost on (if ever it was known by) Michelle, as evidenced by her retreat into victimhood politics. So let me remind/inform her and her speech writer(s) with some top of mind evidence of what that greatness is:
But Michelle was so bogged down in why Chicago should receive the Games, that what Chicago (and America) could give the Games was completely lost on her. If the Olympic Committee had chosen to come to Chicago, the Olympic games would have benefited from ... well, I'm sure the Chicago Olympics team presented that before Michelle, right? We can only hope. And apparently they did, because Michelle said so, but she didn't want to go there:
America is seeing the fruits of a First Lady who declared -- and now we see that she was quite truthful about it -- that was never so proud of her country than when it nominated her husband to be a candidate for president. The final point about Michelle's speech is that she made it so personal by bringing her father, a victim of Multiple Sclerosis, into it. Again, its the politics of personal indignation and pity for victims:
What's the relevance here, especially to the Olympic committee's decision about where to seat the next games? Is it the fact that her Dad was so hip to feminist concepts of gender equality that he taught her to throw a ball? Or is it her display of Girl Power, knowing how to deliver a right hook better than boys in her neighborhood? Or is it the choice of venue? Whether the games are held in Chicago or Rio they would mean many more things to people "all over the world" than the fact that Michelle's Pop taught Michelle how to throw a football and deliver a right hook. You see, Michelle, this may be hard for you to understand, but there a things in this world that are bigger than you and your husband and your Dad's "enlightened" Girl Power training. The Olympic Games, the United States of America, Chicago -- and now Rio -- all come to mind.
on "Michelle Obama's Olympic 'Gimme' Speech"
|
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
|