|
||||||||
|
November 18, 2008 3 Scenarios for the Obama Years: The Good, The Bad and The UglyBy Randall Hoven
The real Barack Obama is still unknown, supposedly. One take is that he is a smart guy who will move toward the center and govern moderately and competently. Another take is that he is the most radical person to ever hold the position of President who will take the US on a hard left course into a socialist state lacking any resemblance to the country our founders gave us.
I also have a third scenario, and it is my scariest one: he will do the latter, but make it appear like the former. That is, he will be take the US on a hard left course, but in such a way so as to not scare the Christopher Buckleys and soccer moms of the world too much, too soon. The Good. The first scenario is the one believed by Christopher Buckley and other "conservatives" who voted for Obama. They believe that Obama will moderate himself once in power and govern like the reasonable fellow in his campaign ads. This would not be that terrible of a situation. Yes, we would get more liberal policies, but nothing too terrible or irreversible - probably not much worse than if McCain had won. If the electorate wants to fix things after experiencing some of this, it will swing from 52% liberal to perhaps 52% conservative in 2010 or 2012. No harm, no foul. The Bad. The second scenario is what Rush Limbaugh believes. Obama, with Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, will so overdo it that the electorate will quickly rectify things starting in 2010, just like it did in 1994. In 1993, President Clinton's first executive order was to allow open gays to serve in the military. Then he appointed his wife to the secret committee to socialize the 15% of the economy that is health care. Both efforts failed, one in the courts and the other in Congress, and set the electorate to trying to fix its mistake. An all-Republican Congress was voted into office in 1994, the first time since 1952, shortly followed by capital-gains tax cuts, free trade, the end of welfare and budget surpluses. (Remember those Republicans?) The Bad scenario might be characterized by the following.
If the more dramatic and least popular of these policies are enacted early, the electorate will want to change the change, maybe even as soon as 2010 -- especially if the economy continues to struggle. In that sense, we conservatives (meaning anyone not socialist) should hope the Obama/Reid/Pelosi ruling coalition gives it to us good and hard and soon. The Ugly. The trouble is that Obama is smart -- a smart leftist. He will make no sudden moves. He will essentially enact The Bad scenario incrementally and by stealth. And every move will have a reasonable-sounding narrative, fully supported by the mass media, popular culture, the education industry and "experts". He will avoid the truly unpopular moves. The tax increases will not be some massive new taxes or big rate increases. There will be just an iddy-biddy rate increase from 36% to 39% on those making over, say, $200,000. They will not "increase" taxes; they just won't continue the existing tax cuts. Social Security taxes won't be "increased", they will just be applied to higher incomes. Not all the social issues will be changed all at once. We'll get federal funding of embryonic stem cell research because it is popular. We won't get full-bore gay marriage, though, because it isn't popular. The Freedom of Choice Act will likely pass, because most people don't care all that much, and we generally expected it from Obama. Spending increases will be under the guise of getting us out of economic trouble. And how much worse could he look than the Republicans who passed a $150 billion stimulus (when Obama at the time was proposing only $120 billion) and an $850 billion bailout supported by both Bush and McCain? We are already talking in increments of trillions. The details of spending (i.e., funding the left), regulation and judicial appointments will all be beneath the radar. No one but insiders, wonks and pundits pay attention to such things. A smart administration (and one run by Rahm Emanuel is smart) can get away with almost anything here. Leftist organizations like ACORN, Planned Parenthood and legal aid societies don't need the amounts of money that earn the notice of Joe Six-Pack. Regulations that apply only to corporations are usually just too hard to follow, and who cares about corporations anyway? Almost anything goes, regulation-wise. Law schools have been pumping out so many leftists that there will be plenty to choose from, all well-credentialed, ABA approved and with no smoking-gun scary rulings in their past. President Obama will not have to appoint Bill Ayers to be Education Secretary to get a Bill Ayer's agenda. The National Education Association, for example, is full of Bill Ayers, but ones with no histories of setting bombs or admitting to being communists. We'll get the communist agenda, but without the fireworks. We are in some rough economic shape right now, but whatever recession we are in should end in the first year or so of Obama's first term. He will get the credit for getting us out of the economic mess that George W. Bush got us into. The war in Iraq is essentially over, with the only uncertainty being whether we pull our troops out in 2009, 2010 or 2011. Again, Obama will get the credit for getting us out of a mess that Bush got us into. Unless a recession turns into another Great Depression and/or the jihadis go nuclear, and maybe even if so, President Obama stands a very good chance of being declared our Savior. As Hoover was to FDR, so Bush will be to BHO. Welcome to the end of the end of the era of big government. And say hello to our new friends Hugo, Raul, Vladimir, Mahmoud and Muammar and good-bye to dead white males like Jefferson and Madison. It's about to get ugly. Randall Hoven can be contacted at randall.hoven@gmail.com or via his web site, kulak.worldbreak.com.
on "3 Scenarios for the Obama Years: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly"
|
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
||