Is Obama committed to Israel's survival?

Is Obama committed to Israel's survival as a Jewish state? The question is serious and the answer may be chilling.  The senator himself has not spoken ill of Israel nor has he made anti-Semitic statements, but it is quite unlikely that a candidate as clever as he would tip his hand on something that vital.  Consider, though, all the influences on the life of Barack Obama.

He has felt comfortable in the company of angry blacks who form the core of anti-Semitism in modern America.  Jeremiah Wright is symptomatic of the sort of aggrieved, irrational black agitator who seriously believes that Jews are a major obstacle to the advancement of blacks and other oppressed minorities around the world. But Reverend Wright is only one example. Cynthia McKinney seriously proposed that Jews did not show up for work in the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 because of some prior cabalistic warning.  Nurtured  black rage led to the 1991 murder in Crown Heights of an Australian Jew, Yankel Rosenbaum, whose sole offense was being a Jew in the wrong part of New York.   Louis Farrakhan, of course, has spread lies about Jews, but even more "mainstream" black leaders like  Jesse Jackson have shown clear dislike of Jews. 

For a black presidential candidate like Colin Powell, Condi Rice, Michael Steele or J.C. Watts, the question of loyalty to our loyalist ally in the world would not be an issue.  These black leaders have clearly and emphatically rejected the sort of hatred that Jeremiah Wright and Louis Farrakhan embrace.  It is doubtful whether those radical blacks would endorse Rice or Steele or Watts for president, if Republicans nominated them.  But Obama has chosen to associate himself with the embittered and resentful branch of black politics.  Unless he believes its calumnies about America and Israel, why did he link himself to this sort of hatred?

But it is not just the black rage school of politics that raises questions about Obama and Israel.  His mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, is another piece of the Obama puzzle.  Although much has been made of his middle name, Hussein, over which Obama has no control, more important is the fact that Obama's mother chose to marry two Muslim husbands both of whom were from Third World nations.  Considering that she was a champion of women's rights and that Islam is notoriously misogynist, this is extraordinary.  

We hear of Muslim women seeking asylum in America and the West, but not of Western feminists marrying Muslim men and then living in the Muslim world. What could have motivated her except the conscious rejection of Western values, something that Obama's mother had very much in common with Jeremiah Wright?   Is it worth noting that among the outrageous statements of Wright, one was that Islam and Christianity had much more in common than most people thought?  (A preposterous lie, but one that conforms to a minister who could blame Israel for being a racist state.)

Obama also chose to marry a woman who seems to be filled with rage and anger at America.  Those who hate America irrationally almost also hate Israel irrationally, and vice versa.  The same resentment at successful peoples, the same rejection of Judeo-Christian values, the same nursing of past wrongs into a sort of fetish or cult draws people into the maelstrom of hating America, hating Israel, hating Christians and hating Jews.

The involuntary influences in the life of Obama, having a mother attracted to Muslim men and who initially sent her son to a Madrasah, and the choices that he made as an adult, marrying an angry black woman who feels America is bad and attending a church where the preacher excoriates Israel from the pulpit and honors odious anti-Semites - these together paint a very worrisome picture of Obama and Israel.

What would President Obama do if the survival of Israel were threatened?  In the past the question was not as crucial as today.  Europe, cowed by its growing and militant Muslim communities and removed by more than six decades from the horrors of the Holocaust, seems truly indifferent to Israel.  In 1973, when the oil boycott smacked Europe, the Dutch, whose citizens remembered what had happened to Dutch Jews twenty-eight years earlier, rode bicycles to demonstrate their independence from Arab threats.  In 2008, does anyone believe the Dutch would do the same?

Not only has Europe lost its nerve, but the threat to Israel is no longer an Arab threat but rather a Muslim threat.  In 1973, the last time Israel faced a very serious threat, the Shah of Iran was in power, and his nation had good relations with Israel.  Radical Islam, with its attendant hatred of Jews and Christians, was not ascendant in the Indian Ocean basin as it is today.  Today, more than any time in the last sixty years, the two real allies against radical Islam are its principal victims - Israel and America.  If America does not play its role in this alliance seriously, then the fate of Israel is in genuine peril.

Today, unlike yesterday, America and Israel cannot afford a president whose support of Israel is not complete and absolute.   We cannot afford a president who thinks that chatting with governments whose official media spews the most absurd and despicable lies about America and Israel is a serious exercise in diplomacy.  We must, instead, have a president certain that America and Israel are the good guys and that the triumphant of these nations - with as little violence as possible - is the only sure answer to peace.  Is Obama this sort of president?  Nothing suggests he is and everything suggests he is not.

Is Obama committed to Israel's survival as a Jewish state? The question is serious and the answer may be chilling.  The senator himself has not spoken ill of Israel nor has he made anti-Semitic statements, but it is quite unlikely that a candidate as clever as he would tip his hand on something that vital.  Consider, though, all the influences on the life of Barack Obama.

He has felt comfortable in the company of angry blacks who form the core of anti-Semitism in modern America.  Jeremiah Wright is symptomatic of the sort of aggrieved, irrational black agitator who seriously believes that Jews are a major obstacle to the advancement of blacks and other oppressed minorities around the world. But Reverend Wright is only one example. Cynthia McKinney seriously proposed that Jews did not show up for work in the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 because of some prior cabalistic warning.  Nurtured  black rage led to the 1991 murder in Crown Heights of an Australian Jew, Yankel Rosenbaum, whose sole offense was being a Jew in the wrong part of New York.   Louis Farrakhan, of course, has spread lies about Jews, but even more "mainstream" black leaders like  Jesse Jackson have shown clear dislike of Jews. 

For a black presidential candidate like Colin Powell, Condi Rice, Michael Steele or J.C. Watts, the question of loyalty to our loyalist ally in the world would not be an issue.  These black leaders have clearly and emphatically rejected the sort of hatred that Jeremiah Wright and Louis Farrakhan embrace.  It is doubtful whether those radical blacks would endorse Rice or Steele or Watts for president, if Republicans nominated them.  But Obama has chosen to associate himself with the embittered and resentful branch of black politics.  Unless he believes its calumnies about America and Israel, why did he link himself to this sort of hatred?

But it is not just the black rage school of politics that raises questions about Obama and Israel.  His mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, is another piece of the Obama puzzle.  Although much has been made of his middle name, Hussein, over which Obama has no control, more important is the fact that Obama's mother chose to marry two Muslim husbands both of whom were from Third World nations.  Considering that she was a champion of women's rights and that Islam is notoriously misogynist, this is extraordinary.  

We hear of Muslim women seeking asylum in America and the West, but not of Western feminists marrying Muslim men and then living in the Muslim world. What could have motivated her except the conscious rejection of Western values, something that Obama's mother had very much in common with Jeremiah Wright?   Is it worth noting that among the outrageous statements of Wright, one was that Islam and Christianity had much more in common than most people thought?  (A preposterous lie, but one that conforms to a minister who could blame Israel for being a racist state.)

Obama also chose to marry a woman who seems to be filled with rage and anger at America.  Those who hate America irrationally almost also hate Israel irrationally, and vice versa.  The same resentment at successful peoples, the same rejection of Judeo-Christian values, the same nursing of past wrongs into a sort of fetish or cult draws people into the maelstrom of hating America, hating Israel, hating Christians and hating Jews.

The involuntary influences in the life of Obama, having a mother attracted to Muslim men and who initially sent her son to a Madrasah, and the choices that he made as an adult, marrying an angry black woman who feels America is bad and attending a church where the preacher excoriates Israel from the pulpit and honors odious anti-Semites - these together paint a very worrisome picture of Obama and Israel.

What would President Obama do if the survival of Israel were threatened?  In the past the question was not as crucial as today.  Europe, cowed by its growing and militant Muslim communities and removed by more than six decades from the horrors of the Holocaust, seems truly indifferent to Israel.  In 1973, when the oil boycott smacked Europe, the Dutch, whose citizens remembered what had happened to Dutch Jews twenty-eight years earlier, rode bicycles to demonstrate their independence from Arab threats.  In 2008, does anyone believe the Dutch would do the same?

Not only has Europe lost its nerve, but the threat to Israel is no longer an Arab threat but rather a Muslim threat.  In 1973, the last time Israel faced a very serious threat, the Shah of Iran was in power, and his nation had good relations with Israel.  Radical Islam, with its attendant hatred of Jews and Christians, was not ascendant in the Indian Ocean basin as it is today.  Today, more than any time in the last sixty years, the two real allies against radical Islam are its principal victims - Israel and America.  If America does not play its role in this alliance seriously, then the fate of Israel is in genuine peril.

Today, unlike yesterday, America and Israel cannot afford a president whose support of Israel is not complete and absolute.   We cannot afford a president who thinks that chatting with governments whose official media spews the most absurd and despicable lies about America and Israel is a serious exercise in diplomacy.  We must, instead, have a president certain that America and Israel are the good guys and that the triumphant of these nations - with as little violence as possible - is the only sure answer to peace.  Is Obama this sort of president?  Nothing suggests he is and everything suggests he is not.