|
||||||||
|
March 02, 2008 America's First CongresswomanBy Ben-Peter Terpstra
We hear much about Hillary Clinton as someone breaking through barriers for women. Here's a test. Who was America's first congresswoman, and which party did she belong to? One brave Republican woman: Jeanette Rankin.
How many feminists know that Montana's groundbreaker, born in 1880, trimmed her own hats, but was still gutsy enough to -- I quote -- tramp "through deep snow potting bears and wolves for pastime"? [i] (Loud claps and laugher.) How many journalists are aware that Miss Rankin, a seamstress, made her own clothes, cooked excellent meals, and "endured all the hardships of pioneers" with her sisters in Montana's wilderness? [ii] I especially like the fact that Rankin, the fighter, could verbally bludgeon Democrats, but "enjoyed being heckled by the crowds" because "she always had a good comeback."[iii] The year was 1916. Not surprisingly, the Fort Wayne Daily News correctly observed that even "after entering politics" Miss Rankin "refused to forsake the old household arts, cooking and needlework." [iv] In the pre-Clinton years, the Congresswoman didn't see why femininity, couldn't walk hand in hand with a career. But, in addition to being ladylike and genuinely independent, Rankin was also cool before the word "cool" was prostituted by stay-at-home beatniks. Indeed, in 1916, the Fort Wayne Daily News (November 11) matter-of-factly reported:
Most controversially, America's first congresswoman would take sharp questions from journalists, while sewing, of course. She (as seen below) was no Clinton.
Immersed in the Gospel of Clintonesia, however, today's fawning reporters paint Hillary as a "groundbreaker." Or, society's brave soul. Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton bemoans that it is "hard" being a woman candidate for president, while jetting around on a chartered plane and staying in the finest hotels. And, while genuine critics attacked Rankin's anti-WWI arguments, for instance, they never criticized her sincerity. Or bravery. Historians cannot say the same about Hillary. In reality, Rankin's libertarian views, back then, were most unpopular in socially elite circles, nor was she necessarily wrong. Or, weak. Or, nuts (as seen below).
Yet, neither the Republican Congresswoman, nor her enemies were prepared for history's sharp turns. By the 1930s, 70 percent of citizens polled, regretted Wilson's war, and the loss of 120,000 American lives. [xi]So, isn't it time to face up to the comparable facts of political life? Republicans fight security threats. Democrats marry them. And, is Rankin's "hysteria" the central issue, or Wilson's? I, for one, can't imagine Hillary tramping "through deep snow potting bears and wolves" either. Can Katie Couric? [i] "First Congresswoman Trims Own Hats, Makes Her Clothes and Can Cook, Too" The Fort Wayne News, Saturday Evening, November 11, 1916, page 3. [vi] Paul Johnson, "Modern Times: The World From the Twenties to the Nineties," Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 1991, page 33. [viii] Cited in Thomas E. Woods, Jr., Ph.D., "The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History," Regenery, 2004, page 130. |
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
||||||||||||||||||