|
| |||||||
|
January 2, 2008 Go Directly To Jihad, Do Not Pass GitmoBy Randall Hoven
Everyone, it seems, from Human Rights Watch to Amnesty International to Hollywood and even to former Secretary of State Colin Powell, is upset with our treatment of Guantanamo detainees and thinks GTMO should be closed.
Here are the facts: (1) a large number, perhaps a majority, of GTMO detainees have already been released; and (2) a good number of those have returned to their deadly jihadi ways, where by their own words "jihad" means "we will attack them in the US and Britain until they either accept Islam or agree to pay jizya." And now there is a connection to the Bhutto assassination. In mid-2005, NPR reported that, "at its height, Guantanamo Bay held about 750 prisoners." By the spring of 2006, 538 Guantanamo detainees had been released . By the summer of 2007, the Pentagon reported that "at least 30 former GTMO detainees have taken part in anti-coalition militant activities after leaving U.S. detention." Since "the US government does not generally track ex-GTMO detainees after repatriation or resettlement," one could surmise that those 30 were only a fraction of former detainees who have returned to militant activities or other anti-US activities. Why did we release them? They lied, and we apparently could not prove otherwise.
One of those 30 released was Abdullah Mehsud. Abdullah had a little brother, Baitullah:
After Abdullah's death, Baitullah took over the Mehsud operation:.
According to the BBC , Baitullah
But most recently, Baitullah has been implicated in the assassination of Benazir Bhutto. According to Anthony Bruno, Baitullah said in an interview with the BBC,
If these are the types of people already released from GTMO for insufficient evidence, what does that say about those still held there? They did not just happen to be in Pakistan or Afghanistan for a wedding. They lie, they kill, they torture. And they do it on scales that can topple governments and democratic movements, and that is exactly their intention. In short, they are as dangerous as anyone could possibly be. Yet critics of the U.S. want to set them free.
Once again, the U.S. gets blamed for being too harsh, when it has really been to lenient. Randall Hoven can be reached at randall.hoven@gmail.com. on "Go Directly To Jihad, Do Not Pass Gitmo"
|
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
|