|
||||||||
|
February 19, 2007 Questioning Mitt's FaithBy Thomas LifsonThere many issues that will be discussed about Mormon doctrine, assuming Romney remains viable. Religion was a thorny topic even before political correctness. We'll see all sorts of treatments, motivated by everything from sincere interest and respect to outright hatred. Mark Finkelstein of Newsbusters catches Stephanopoulos challenging Romney's own explanation of his beliefs. [emphasis in original]
Finkelstein sees the new precedent:
The answer is probably both a double standard, and more media addressing candidates' religion. Barack Obama's church and pastor have attracted attention, and there was a debunked story that he had attended a radical madrassa in Jakarta. Religion and politics overlap these days, as they often have in the past. And particularly when lesser-understood faiths are in question, people want to know more. Religion is important. If Romney does well, and especially if he were to become the nominee, his faith's doctrines are going to be of compelling interest to many people. The media are not what they used to be, and there is no bottling up of issues as off-limits. The story can't be done justice in an interview gotcha game. Stephanopoulos as theologian just does not sell, even though his father was a Greek Orthodox prelate. His ham-handed I had my staff call somebody retort is not a convincing claim to scriptural mastery. I would guess the story is more complicated. That doesn't mean the topic is going to be off limits. Romney has put the subject in play by addressing it in public. And people are interested, for reasons good, bad and ugly. So expect more attention to the Latter Day Saints.
Hat tip: Bryan Demko |
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
||