|
| |||||||
|
January 26, 2007 Iraq and the Ghost of Johnnie CochranBy Michael J. O'SheaIt was a wickedly simple strategy. It still is. Killer becomes accuser, cop gets crucified, killer walks. Brentwood the stage then, Baghdad the stage now. But the play is the same. The Killer Every horror in Iraq today - killing, kidnapping, refugee - was more horrid under Saddam. There was no hope. There was only Saddam.
No matter that his Iraq was more savage than Darfur and rivaled Rwanda. No matter that thousands fled in terror from him; thousands died grotesquely because of him; thousands of children shriveled into corpses malnourished due to him; rape rooms screamed to the delight of him; bodies twisted, tortured on orders from him; power, marshlands, minds were corroded because of him: so Saddam could be esteemed as supreme, worshipped even more than the God he professed to adore while he whored Iraq. He would have been even more horrid had he still reigned. Freed from sanctions, fueled by cash, rebuilding weapons he was determined to gain again - and with Iran arming next door - Saddam would have shown Ahmadinejad how to make the world tremble. Stories gloated about what Iraq Study Group inspector Charles Duelfer did not find in Iraq after Saddam fell. And junked what he did find.
For twelve years Saddam stalled, dodged, deceived. UN inspectors proved he had built Weapons of Mass Destruction, demanded proof he no longer had them, ordered him under international law to reveal everything, destroy nothing, turn all - weapons, precursors, plans, plants, documents, equipment - over to UN inspectors. And received only lie after lie after lie sworn to be truth. Not one of the UN inspection chiefs - not Rolf Ekeus, not Richard Butler, not Hans Blix, not Mohamed ElBaradei - could prove he no longer had prohibited weapons. Nor did they need to: it was for Saddam - and only Saddam - to convince the world he had nothing. Colin Powell put it bluntly:
Instead, Saddam used children as pawns, sympathy pawns to lift sanctions - not for the children - but so he could rearm. Not a single child mattered to him - sacrifices all on his altar to himself. His charade mattered most. Saddam, short order cook ready to fire up, would reign. And be remembered. Uday might succeed him, Qusay might: but neither would be Saddam. Nebuchadnezzar. Saladin. Saddam. Gods walking the face of the earth. But only Saddam would have weapons that could destroy the earth. His would-be successors would be even worse. They too kill - but for here-and-now power, using religion as a mask, suckering those also without soul to die crying "God is great." As they blast children into scraps of flesh, tidbits of bone. Cannibals, devouring even their own, to rule. Saddam used sympathy to get what he sought. His would-be successors use "civil war." There is no civil war in Iraq. There is no sectarian war in Iraq. There is a power war in Iraq to see who rules - and how. Al Qaeda would rule as the Taliban ruled Afghanistan. It would use Iraq as Al Qaeda used Afghanistan: to attack, fueled this time by 115 billion barrels of oil. At $60 dollars a barrel, what weapons couldn't it buy? Al Qaeda is pledged to get WMD. Pledged to use WMD. Pledged to destroy the United States. It cares nothing about life. It cares only about death. Saddamists would rule as Saddam did: ruthlessly, vengefully, destroying all who brought Saddam down, jeered as he hung, paraded at his death, mocked his name. Shia fanatics would rule as Iran is ruled. America - Satan - would know Hell. This earth does not matter. Its end does not matter. Death to America matters. Seventy percent of Iraqi voters instead sought peace, still seek peace. They understand what the 57-nation Organization of the Islamic Conference - Sunni and Shia both - meant when it issued
The OIC - "Muslim scholars and the religious establishments in Iraq, Shiite or Sunni combined" - went on:
The OIC's Secretary-General further stressed
and affirmed,
He quoted Ayatollah Sistani saying
and reminding all Iraqis
Ayatollah Sheikh Al Yaqubi proclaimed:
Ayatollah Sheikh Bashir Al-Najafi adamantly stated
The Secretary-General of the Commission of Muslim Scholars declared:
Another declaration reinforced this stance:
The press, of course, printed nothing of that, preferring instead their spin of civil/sectarian war. There is no civil war, no sectarian war in Iraq. There is arson. And the arsonist is Al Qaeda. Its spectacular attacks and suicide bombs are Al Qaeda's version of "Shock and Awe" geared to goad Shias to forget their faith and attack, Sunnis to attack back. Which is why Al Qaeda destroyed the Golden Mosque in Samarra just as it had the Twin Towers in New York. The Towers were known by Americans, but they were not revered by Americans. The mosque was revered by, sacred to, Shias. Which is why Al Qaeda destroyed it. And gleefully watched as Shias erupted against Sunnis, Sunnis erupted back. Precisely as Al Qaeda had planned. Twin Towers: Al Qaeda brought them down. Twin Powers - the US and the Soviet Union - Al Qaeda would bring them down, just as it did the Twin Buddhas in Afghanistan. September 11 was one step to defeating America; February 22 - George Washington's birthday - was a second step, the day the Samarra mosque fell, digging a pit for America to fall again. Al Qaeda would have the world believe Sunnis and Shias are vengeful all, enemies all to the death. No matter that tribe after Iraqi tribe is mixed, with Sunnis and Shias intermarried. No matter that Iraqi Kurds are Sunni and Shia and at peace with each other. No matter that Kurdish Sunni outnumber Iraqi Arab Sunni. No matter that Iraq's interim president, Sunni Ghazi Al Yawar, said while president:
Terrorists - Al Qaeda, Saddamists, Shia fanatics - create chaos, confusion, frustration so that America throws up its hands, throws down its arms, and leaves - leaving Iraq to them. The Cop If America had set out to conquer Iraq, it could have done so long ago, crushing Iraq as it did Japan, leveling Iraq as it did Germany. That is not what Operation Iraqi Freedom sought. It's not what these four years have been about. "Conquer" Iraq and it would have become to Arabs what Israel is now; but worse. An endless river of jihadists would have rushed to Iraq as they did to Afghanistan when the Soviets tried to conquer it. While others seeped into America to finish what they started on September 11. Instead, the US set out to do what's never been done before: simultaneously topple a tyrant, aid in reconstituting a nation, help in rebuilding that country. The Marshall Plan didn't begin until three years after Germany fell from a six-year war and took two more years to complete: eleven years from war to reconstruction. Iraq has had a third as much time. American success brought on the savagery in Iraq today: Saddam dead, Uday dead, Qusay dead, Zarqawi dead, the deck of cards shredded, constitution endorsed by an enormous majority, parliament seated and legislating on topics no other Arab country would touch, prime minister taking charge, schools and clinics and water and electricity and commerce rising. Would-be successors see Iraq slipping out of their grasp. And so they attack. No wonder then that Central Command General John Abizaid said to the US Senate:
But no one heard that. Or this.
Nor did anyone heard him add:
Who heard General Peter Chiarelli when he said,
He also noted:
And Al Qaeda, Johnnie-on-the-spot, smiled. Who heard British Lt. General Graeme Lamb, Deputy Commander of Multinational Force-Iraq - just last week - say:
Wishful thinking? Then why do Americans - by the thousands - re-enlist and return to Iraq after they've served in Iraq? Why do thousands more volunteer to serve knowing they might head to Iraq? Why is Cindy Sheehan dying for attention, while her son only died to serve? How many Americans know that, before the First Cavalry arrived, Sadr City had 61% unemployment, no electricity or drinking water and sewage two-feet deep? That 1st Cav conducted over 800 engineering projects, constructed 600 schools, hired 20,000 Iraqis, pumped millions in the economy - and that Cindy Sheehan's son was part of that force? That he enlisted, re-enlisted, chose to volunteer - and died - rescuing fellow troops so they could get back to rebuilding? For the press, the answer is simple: If you build it, they'll be bored. Sadr, Sharpton: One. Iraq will soon see what Prime Minister Al-Maliki already knows: Sadr needs Maliki more than Maliki needs Sadr. Sadr heard his elders preach and scold him indirectly. He sees his factions split and knows he's losing his political and military base. Without followers he is nothing, just as is Sharpton without cameras. Sadr is Maliki's Joe McCarthy. Truman urged Eisenhower to berate the senator; Ike chose to let him ruin himself by himself. He did. Sadr will, too. Saddam no longer rules Iraq; but the ghost of Johnnie Cochran does: killer becomes accuser, cop gets crucified, killer walks. Frame the debate, and you can frame anyone.
on "Iraq and the Ghost of Johnnie Cochran"
|
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
||