|
||||||||
|
August 16, 2004 Hollywood: the imperial cityBy Ed LaskyOnly a few cities throughout history have had the impact of Hollywood: Washington is the locus of political power, and Mecca, Rome and Jerusalem are famed for their sacral status. However, as we move into the new Millennium, Hollywood projects an influence and force that transcends borders and nationalities —— a power that is vastly disproportionate to its actual physical size*. Hollywood wields a power which defines America(ns) abroad and influences our own self—image: a power that can create desires, influence opinions, distort history and "create facts." The diplomatic corps does not hold a candle to the hypnotic control that Hollywood can have over billions of people overseas, as it imposes its culture and mores on them. The vast amount of wealth generated in these colonies by this imperium flows into American politics and promises to continue to play a role as kingmaker in American elections. As is true of many other imperial powers throughout history, Hollywood also displays a greed, arrogance, blindness and hubris that imperil our future. A Los Angeles op—ed shortly after 9/11 pointed out how this imagery harms America. The op—ed reported that public opinion surveys around the world characterize Americans as overbearing, sexually immoral, materialistic and prone to violence. Since many of these people have never been to America and do not come across many Americans, they develop their impressions largely from Hollywood. As social scientists have discovered over the last 50 years, the younger you are the more likely you are to hold views often characterized as being stridently liberal. Further, because this money may have come so easily and at such a young age, many in Hollywood may have a residual guilt about their wealth and seek to "do good" by giving to a variety of causes and Democratic politicians. The Democrats have been able to tap this mindset. Given the celebrity culture we live in, this power can be magnified by celebrities putting on shows to raise funds for Democrats or merely opening their homes for events. The New York Times even saw fit to give Bruce Springsteen precious space on its editorial page to pen a banal anti—Bush screed. |
Recent Articles
Blog Posts
|
|
||